dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T12:40:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T18:14:10Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T12:40:52Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T18:14:10Z
dc.date.created2019-10-04T12:40:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-01
dc.identifierAngle Orthodontist. Newton N: E H Angle Education Research Foundation, Inc, v. 89, n. 5, p. 833-833, 2019.
dc.identifier0003-3219
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/186056
dc.identifierWOS:000482085000023
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5367108
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherE H Angle Education Research Foundation, Inc
dc.relationAngle Orthodontist
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleRe: Response to: Comparison of anterior retraction and anchorage control between en masse retraction and two-step retraction: A randomized prospective clinical trial. Patricia Pigato Schneider, Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Junior, Andre da Costa Monini, Ary dos Santos Pinto, Ki Beom Kim. The Angle Orthodontist. 2019 Mar; 89(2): 190-199
dc.typeOtros


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución