Resultados de la valoración contingente para estimar los impactos ambientales causados por la descarga de cenizas (rock-ash) en la República Dominicana

Results of the contingent valuation to estimate the environmental impacts caused by rock-ash discharge

dc.creatorGómez-Valenzuela, Víctor
dc.creatorAlpízar, Francisco
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-10T20:17:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-06T13:38:44Z
dc.date.available2020-09-10T20:17:22Z
dc.date.available2022-12-06T13:38:44Z
dc.date.created2020-09-10T20:17:22Z
dc.identifierhttps://repositoriobiblioteca.intec.edu.do/handle/123456789/2817
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5239458
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo (INTEC)
dc.relationhttps://revistas.intec.edu.do/index.php/ciene/article/view/1797/2325
dc.relationhttps://revistas.intec.edu.do/index.php/ciene/article/view/1797/2326
dc.relation/*ref*/ACAA. 2016. About Coal Ash [Online]. Farmington Hills, Michigan: American Coal Ash Association (ACAA). Available: https://www.acaa-usa.org/About-Coal-Ash/What-are-CCPs/Bottom-Ash [Accessed 08/09/2017 2017].
dc.relation/*ref*/ADAMS, C., SEROA DA MOTTA, R., ARIGONI ORTIZ, R., REID, J., EBERSBACH AZNAR, C. & DE ALMEIDA SINISGALLI, P. A. 2008. The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil). Ecological Economics, 66, 359-370.
dc.relation/*ref*/AKHTAR, S., SALEEM, W., NADEEM, V. M., SHAHID, I. & IKRAM, A. 2017. Assessment of willingness to pay for improved air quality using contingent valuation method. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 3, 279-286.
dc.relation/*ref*/ATTALI, J. 2010. República Dominicana 2010-2030. Santo Domingo: Ministerio de Economía, Planificación y Desarrollo.
dc.relation/*ref*/BANCO-CENTRAL. 2017. Estadísticas económicas [Online]. Santo Domingo, D. N.: Banco Central de la República Dominciana. Available: https://www.bancentral.gov.do/estadisticas_economicas/real/ [Accessed 30/08/2017 2017].
dc.relation/*ref*/BISHOP, R. C., BOYLE, K. J., CARSON, R. T., CHAPMAN, D., HANEMANN, W. M., KANNINEN, B., KOPP, R. J., KROSNICK, J. A., LIST, J., MEADE, N., PATERSON, R., PRESSER, S., SMITH, V. K., TOURANGEAU, R., WELSH, M., WOOLDRIDGE, J. M., DEBELL, M., DONOVAN, C., KONOPKA, M. & SCHERER, N. 2017. Putting a value on injuries to natural assets: The BP oil spill. Science, 356, 253-254.
dc.relation/*ref*/BISHOP, R. C. & HABERLEIN, T. A. 1979. Measuring values of extra-market goods: Are indirect measures biased?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 926-930.
dc.relation/*ref*/CARSON, R. T. 2012. Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative when Prices Aren’t Available. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26, 27-42.
dc.relation/*ref*/CARSON, R. T., FLORES, N. E., MARTIN, K. M. & WRIGHT, J. L., 1996. Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Economics, 72, 80-99.
dc.relation/*ref*/CARSON, R. T., MITCHEL, R. C., HANEMANN, M., KOPP, R. J., PRESSER, S. & RUUD, P. A. 2003. Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Environmental and Resource Economics, 25, 257-286.
dc.relation/*ref*/DAVIS, R. K. 1963. The Value of Outdoor Recreation: An Economic Study of the Maine Woods. Doctoral PhD Dissertation, Harvard.
dc.relation/*ref*/DE LEÓN, O. 2009. Rockash y contaminación ambiental [Online]. Santo Domingo, D. N.: Grupo de Medio Corripio. Available: http://eldia.com.do/rockash-y-contaminacion-ambiental-2/ [Accessed 08/09/2017 2017].
dc.relation/*ref*/EPA. 2017a. Coal Ash Basics [Online]. Washington, D. C.: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Available: https://www.epa.gov/coalash/coal-ash-basics [Accessed 08/09/2017 2017].
dc.relation/*ref*/EPA. 2017b. Law & Regulations [Online]. Washington, D. C.: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Available: https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-comprehensive-environmental-response-compensation-and-liability-act [Accessed 09/09/2017 2017].
dc.relation/*ref*/FREEMAN, A. M., III, HERRIGES, J. A. & KLING, C. L. 2014. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values, New York, U.S.A., RFF Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/GÓMEZ-VALENZUELA, V. & ALPÍZAR, F. 2007. Valoración económica de los impactos ambientales causados por la disposición del rockash en la República Dominicana. Santo Domingo, D. N.: Secretaría de Estado de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.
dc.relation/*ref*/HANEMANN, W. M. 1994. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 19-43.
dc.relation/*ref*/HARRISON, G. W. 2001. Contingent Valuation Meets the Experts: A Critique of the NOAA Panel Report. Columbia, SC. USA: University of South Carolina.
dc.relation/*ref*/HARRISON, G. W. 2006. Assesing damages for the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.: University of Central Florida.
dc.relation/*ref*/KRISTRÖM, B. 1990. A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. Land Economics, 66, 135-139.
dc.relation/*ref*/L. NANDAGIRI, J. 2015. Evaluation of Economic Value of Pilikula Lake using Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Methods. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 1315-1321.
dc.relation/*ref*/LIU, C.-C., HERRIGES, J. A., KLING, C. L., SECCHI, S., NASSAUER, J. I. & PHANEUF, D. J. 2014. A Comparison of Value Elicitation Question Formats in Multiple-Good Contingent Valuation. Frontiers of Economics in China, 9, 85-108.
dc.relation/*ref*/MAHIEU, P.-A., RIERA, P., KRISTRÖM, B., BRÄNNLUND, R. & GIERGICZNY, M. 2014. Exploring the determinants of uncertainty in contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3, 186-200.
dc.relation/*ref*/MEPYD 2016. Análisis del Desempeño Económico y Social de República Dominicana 2015. Santo Domingo, D. N.: Ministerio de Economía, Planificación y Desarrollo (MEPyD).
dc.relation/*ref*/ONE 2007. ENHOGAR 2007. Encuesta Nacional de Hogares de Propósitos Múltiples Santo Domingo, D. N.: Oficina Nacional de Estadística (ONE).
dc.relation/*ref*/ONE. 2009. Censo Nacional 2002. Vol. II Características de Viviendas y Hogares [Online]. Santo Domingo, D. N. : Oficina Nacional de Estadística (ONE). Available: https://www.one.gob.do/Estadisticas/265/censo-2002 [Accessed 12/09/2017 2017].
dc.relation/*ref*/ONE 2012. División Territorial 2012. Santo Domingo, D. N.: Oficina Nacional de Estadística (ONE).
dc.relation/*ref*/PORTNEY, P. R. 1994. The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 3-17.
dc.relation/*ref*/RAMAJO-HERNÁNDEZ, J. & SAZ-SALAZAR, S. D. 2012. Estimating the non-market benefits of water quality improvement for a case study in Spain: A contingent valuation approach. Environmental Science and Policy, 47-59.
dc.relation/*ref*/SCHEAFFER, R. L., MENDENHALL III, W., OTT, R. L. & GEROW, K. G. 2011. Elementary Survery Sampling Florence, KY, United States, Cengage Learning, Inc.
dc.relation/*ref*/TAO, Z., YAN, H. & ZHAN, J. 2012. Economic Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services in Heshui Watershed using Contingent Valuation Method. Procedia Environmental Services, 13, 2445-2450.
dc.relation/*ref*/UNDP 2016. Human Development Report 2016. Human Development for Everyone. New York, USA: United Nations Development Programme.
dc.relation/*ref*/VOLTAIRE, L., PIRRONE, C. & BAILLY, D. 2013. Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent willingness to pay for a nature protection program: A new approach. Ecological Economics, 88, 76-85.
dc.relation/*ref*/WHITTINGTON, D. 1998. Administering Contingent Valuation Surveys in Developing Countries. World Development, 26, 21-30.
dc.relation/*ref*/WORLD-BANK. 2017. Data Bank [Online]. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. Available: http://databank.bancomundial.org/data/reports.aspx? [Accessed 30/08/2017 2017].
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2020 Ciencia, Economía y Negocios
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceScience, Economy & Business; Vol 4 No 1 (2020): Science, Economics and Business; 5-24
dc.sourceCiencia, Economía y Negocios; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2020): Ciencia, Economía y Negocios; 5-24
dc.source2613-8778
dc.source2613-876X
dc.source10.22206/ceyn.2020.v4i1
dc.subjectvaloración contingente
dc.subjectceniza de roca
dc.subjectrock ash
dc.subjectSamaná
dc.subjectMontecristi
dc.subjectRepública Dominicana
dc.subjectcontingent valuation
dc.subjectrock ash
dc.subjectSamana
dc.subjectMontecristi
dc.subjectDominican Republic
dc.titleResultados de la valoración contingente para estimar los impactos ambientales causados por la descarga de cenizas (rock-ash) en la República Dominicana
dc.titleResults of the contingent valuation to estimate the environmental impacts caused by rock-ash discharge
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución