dc.contributorSalas Rueda, Mauricio Xavier
dc.creatorAjila Cobos, Nixon Raúl
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-19T15:15:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T18:04:03Z
dc.date.available2021-03-19T15:15:27Z
dc.date.available2022-10-20T18:04:03Z
dc.date.created2021-03-19T15:15:27Z
dc.date.issued2021-02
dc.identifierhttp://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/19992
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4568145
dc.description.abstractIn order to compare an immune response, an indirect Elisa analysis was performed to measure post-vaccinal antibody levels against Newcastle disease in broiler chickens using two vaccination methods: oral (Treatment A), and aspersion (Treatment B) with which it has been shown that there is no significant difference between vaccination methods.
dc.languagespa
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador
dc.subjectVETERINARIA
dc.subjectPOLLOS - ENFERMEDADES
dc.subjectENFERMEDAD DE NEWCASTLE - VACUNACIÓN
dc.subjectPOLLOS - VACUNACIÓN
dc.subjectANTÍGENOS
dc.subjectINMUNOENSAYO - ELISA
dc.titleComparación de títulos de anticuerpos post-vacunales de Newcastle en pollos vacunados por vía oral vs. aspersión utilizando la técnica de ELISA indirecta
dc.typebachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución