Artículos de revistas
New parameter of the second half of the p-wave, p-wave duration, and atrial conduction times predict atrial fibrillation during electrophysiological studies
Fecha
2021Registro en:
Med Princ Pract 2021;30:462–469
10.1159/000518262
Autor
Carmona Puerta, Raimundo
Lorenzo Martínez, Elizabeth
Rabassa López-Calleja, Magda Alina
Padrón Pena, Gustavo
Castro Torres, Yaniel
Cruz Elizundia, Juan Miguel
Rodríguez González, Fernando
García Vázquez, Luis Ángel
Chávez González, Elibet
Institución
Resumen
Objective: Several P-wave parameters reflect atrial conduction characteristics and have been used to predict atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between maximum P-wave duration (PMax) and new P-wave parameters, with atrial conduction times (CT), and to assess their predictive value of AF during electrophysiological studies (AF-EPS). Subjects and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in 153 randomly selected patients aged 18-70 years, undergoing EPS. The patients were divided into 2 groups designated as no AF-EPS and AF-EPS, depending on whether AF occurred during EPS or not. Different P-wave parameters and atrial CT were compared for both study groups. Subsequently, the predictive value of the P-wave parameters and the atrial CT for AF-EPS was evaluated. Results: The values of CT, PMax, and maximum Ppeak-Pend interval (Pp-eMax) were significantly higher in patients with AF-EPS. Almost all P-wave parameters were correlated with the left CT. PMax, Pp-eMax, and CT were univariate and multivariate predictors of AF-EPS. The largest ROC area was presented by interatrial CT (0.852; p < 0.001; cutoff value: 82.5 ms; sensitivity: 91.1%; specificity: 81.1%). Pp-eMax showed greater sensitivity (79.5%) to discriminate AF-EPS than PMax (72.7%), but the latter had better specificity (60.4% vs. 41.5%). Conclusions: Left atrial CT were directly and significantly correlated with PMax and almost all the parameters of the second half of the P-wave. CT, PMax, and Pp-eMax (new parameter) were good predictors of AF-EPS, although CT did more robustly.