info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Fellows perspective of HPB training in Latin America
Fecha
2019-07Registro en:
Domínguez Rosado, Ismael; Espinoza, Johana L.; Alvarez, Fernando A.; Vintimilla, Agustin; Quintero, Marco; et al.; Fellows perspective of HPB training in Latin America; Elsevier Science; Hpb; 22; 1; 7-2019; 124-128
1365-182X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Domínguez Rosado, Ismael
Espinoza, Johana L.
Alvarez, Fernando A.
Vintimilla, Agustin
Quintero, Marco
Barzallo, David
Pekolj, Juan
Gondolesi, Gabriel Eduardo
Schelotto, Pablo B.
Herman, Paulo
Carneiro D'Albuquerque, Luiz A.
Andraus, Wellington
Padilla, Jorge
Jarufe, Nicolas
Chapa, Oscar
Mercado, Miguel
Chan, Carlos
Alseidi, Adnan
Resumen
Background: Currently, no standards for HPB training exist in Latin America. The aim of this work is to evaluate fellows' experience of HPB training and the areas of opportunity to improve. Methods: A 35 points survey was developed and distributed among fellows from dedicated HPB training programs in Latin America. The survey was applied by direct phone call (37%) or web based (63%), to fellows graduated between 2010 and 2014, from 7 different programs. Results: Thirty-nine fellows from Argentina, Brazil, Chile and México were considered with a response rate of 82% (32/39). Most fellows (90%) shared cases with more than one co-fellow. Scrubbing with chief residents ocurred to 60% of fellows; only 14% of fellows noted having a primary surgeon role in more than 70% of cases. Median number of major hepatectomies during training was 15 (1–100), Whipple procedures 6 (1–40), and major bile duct repair 20 (1–80). Limited funding was the main reason to avoid HPB programs outside the country of origin. Conclusion: HPB training in Latin America requires more operative volume and autonomy. Financial burden is the main limitation to pursue training overseas. A multinational fellowship that takes advantage of each center may overcome differences in volume and type of cases.