dc.creatorDazeo, Nicolás Ignacio
dc.creatorDottori, Javier Alejandro
dc.creatorBoroni, Gustavo Adolfo
dc.creatorLarrabide, Ignacio
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-19T16:28:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T07:06:46Z
dc.date.available2020-03-19T16:28:42Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T07:06:46Z
dc.date.created2020-03-19T16:28:42Z
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.identifierDazeo, Nicolás Ignacio; Dottori, Javier Alejandro; Boroni, Gustavo Adolfo; Larrabide, Ignacio; A comparative study of porous medium CFD models for flow diverter stents: Advantages and shortcomings; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering; 34; 12; 12-2018; 1-11
dc.identifier2040-7939
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/100245
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4358593
dc.description.abstractIn computational fluid dynamics, there is a high interest in modeling flow diverter stents as porous media due to its reduced computational loads. One of the main difficulties of such models is proper parameter setup. Most authors assume flow diverter's wire screen as an isotropic and homogeneous medium, while others proposes anisotropic configurations, yet very little is discussed about the effect of these assumptions on model's accuracy. In this paper, we compare the effect of different models on hemodynamics in relation to their parameters. The fidelity and efficiency of the different models to capture wire screen effect on fluid flow are quantitatively analyzed and compared.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cnm.3145
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3145
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectCFD
dc.subjectFLOW DIVERTER
dc.subjectMODELING
dc.subjectPOROUS MEDIUM
dc.titleA comparative study of porous medium CFD models for flow diverter stents: Advantages and shortcomings
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución