dc.creatorRikap, Cecilia Alejandra
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-05T20:13:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T02:56:08Z
dc.date.available2019-04-05T20:13:28Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T02:56:08Z
dc.date.created2019-04-05T20:13:28Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifierRikap, Cecilia Alejandra; The Meanings of University's Autonomy in Western History as a Clue to Understand the Consequences of Universities' Differentiated Adoption of Enterprise Features; Institute for Education Policy Studies; Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies; 15; 3; 12-2017; 266-304
dc.identifier1740-2743
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/73354
dc.identifier2051-0969
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4337407
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the meanings of university’s autonomy throughout western history and capitalism’s recent transformations in order to suggest a taxonomy of present universities according to the type of capital enterprise they are imitating. As a first step, we distinguish three dimensions of university’s autonomy in the Medieval University and the Enlightenment University models: corporative, reason and financial autonomy. We use them to suggest that current universities are adopting capital enterprises’ features in a differentiated way, impacting differently on their autonomy. Thus, we propose a differentiated model called the Differentiated Market-University, integrated by the Single Purpose, the Technological and the Enhanced University. The Single Purpose University acts like a capital enterprise concerning mainly its teaching activity. In the Technological and the Enhanced Universities teaching is also guided by market needs. Nevertheless, they additionally face, differently, the consequences of knowledge’s direct contribution to capital’s accumulation. The Enhanced University dominates innovation circuits keeping a significant part of its innovation’s economic benefit. On the other hand, the Technological University loses those profits. We conclude our article by highlighting the continuities and ruptures between former university models and our taxonomy.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInstitute for Education Policy Studies
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.jceps.com/archives/3631
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.jceps.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/15-3-9.pdf
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectHISTORICAL UNIVERSITY MODELS
dc.subjectUNIVERSITY'S AUTONOMY
dc.subjectTEACHING AND RESEARCH COMODIFICATION
dc.subjectMARKET UNIVERSITY'S DIFFERENTIATION
dc.titleThe Meanings of University's Autonomy in Western History as a Clue to Understand the Consequences of Universities' Differentiated Adoption of Enterprise Features
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución