| dc.creator | Pico Bonilla, Claudia Milena | |
| dc.creator | Gil Mateus, Edwin Oswaldo | |
| dc.creator | Clavijo Álvarez, Álvaro Arturo | |
| dc.date | 2017-01-01T08:00:00Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-13T13:38:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-10-13T13:38:01Z | |
| dc.identifier | https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/scopus_unisalle/341 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4158167 | |
| dc.description | Behavioral economics has applied psychology concepts related to cognitive analysis, which gives little importance to environmental effects. In contrast, the analysis of behavior gives a central role to the environment, and therefore employs concepts such as reinforcement schedules and stimuli control. In this document presents the cognitive-behavioral discussion about choice behavior. In addition, we compare their methods through two experiments dealing with the base-rate fallacy. In the experiments, the characteristics of the stimuli (verbal and non-verbal) are varied and contrasted. The paper concludes that this fallacy occurs on a smaller scale when there are less irrelevant stimuli. | |
| dc.source | Revista de Economia Institucional | |
| dc.source | 313 | |
| dc.subject | Base-rate neglect | |
| dc.subject | Experimental analysis of behavior | |
| dc.subject | Heuristics | |
| dc.title | Cognition and behavior in the fallacy of base rates | |
| dc.type | Article | |
