dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:29:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:48:46Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:29:01Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:48:46Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:29:01Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-01
dc.identifierMicroscopy Research and Technique, v. 76, n. 5, p. 533-537, 2013.
dc.identifier1059-910X
dc.identifier1097-0029
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/75195
dc.identifier10.1002/jemt.22196
dc.identifierWOS:000317299500012
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84875952623
dc.identifier1627568419811788
dc.identifier1411074363039082
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3924133
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of QMiX, SmearClear, and 17% EDTA for the debris and smear layer removal from the root canal and its effects on the push-out bond strength of an epoxy-based sealer by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Forty extracted human canines (n=10) were assigned to the following final rinse protocols: G1-distilled water (control), G2-17% EDTA, G3-SmearClear, and G4-QMiX. The specimens were submitted to a SEM analysis to evaluate the presence of debris and smear layer, respectively, in the apical or cervical segments. In sequence, forty extracted human maxillary canines with the root canals instrumented were divided into four groups (n=10) similar to the SEM analysis study. After the filling with AH Plus, the roots were transversally sectioned to obtain dentinal slices. The specimens were submitted to a push-out bond strength test using an electromechanical testing machine. The statistical analysis for the SEM and push-out bond strength studies were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α=5%). There was no difference among the G2, G3, and G4 efficacy in removing the debris and smear layer (P>0.05). The efficacy of these groups was superior to the control group. The push-out bond strength values of G2, G3, and G4 were superior to the control group. The ability to remove the debris and smear layer by SmearClear and QMiX was as effective as the 17% EDTA. The final rinse with these solutions promoted similar push-out bond strength values. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationMicroscopy Research and Technique
dc.relation1.087
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDebris
dc.subjectDentine
dc.subjectEndodontics
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectSmear layer
dc.subjectbiomedical and dental materials
dc.subjectepoxy resin
dc.subjectepoxy resin based root canal sealer
dc.subjectepoxy resin-based root canal sealer
dc.subjectroot canal filling material
dc.subjectcanine tooth
dc.subjectdebridement
dc.subjectdental surgery
dc.subjectdrug effect
dc.subjectendodontics
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectin vitro study
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopy
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.subjectCuspid
dc.subjectDebridement
dc.subjectEpoxy Resins
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning
dc.subjectRoot Canal Filling Materials
dc.subjectRoot Canal Irrigants
dc.subjectRoot Canal Preparation
dc.subjectSmear Layer
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.titleEffect of the root canal final rinse protocols on the debris and smear layer removal and on the push-out strength of an epoxy-based sealer
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución