dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:27:21Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:38:53Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:27:21Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:38:53Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:27:21Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-01
dc.identifierAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012, v. 7, p. 5583-5587.
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/73937
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84871771228
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84871771228.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3922907
dc.description.abstractCommon Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is widespread in the social and economic scene in Brazil, as well it is Brazilian population main dish, and it also helps small and medium farmers' income. The objective of this study was to compare the productivity performance of common bean Carioca - IAC Alvorada with irrigation suppression in each of the five phenological phases. The experiment was conducted in plots in a greenhouse at College of Agronomical Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu - SP. The hypothesis is that if the water supply is suppressed in one of the five development stages of irrigated common beans, the yield reduction would be at least 20%. The treatments consisted of suppression irrigation in one of the five development stages (stage V1 to V3, stage V4 to early flowering, flowering stage, pod formation stage and pod filling stage) compared with the irrigation at all stages and suppression of irrigation at all stages, with seven treatments and four replications. The treatments most affected by water suppression were those which suffered suppression of irrigation during the vegetative phase and flowering stage. Treatments with water suppression in all stages, and suppression during the phases (stage V1 to V3, stage V4 to early flowering, flowering stage, pod formation stage and pod filling stage) showed yield reduction of approximately 95%, 55.1%, 49.5%, 63,1%, 30.2% and 35.6%, respectively, when compared to treatment with irrigation all stages. All treatments considered confirmed the hypothesis.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectIrrigation suppression
dc.subjectPhaseolus vulgaris L.
dc.subjectPhenological phases
dc.subjectProduction
dc.subjectBotucatu
dc.subjectCommon beans
dc.subjectDevelopment stages
dc.subjectEarly-flowering
dc.subjectFilling stage
dc.subjectFlowering stage
dc.subjectFormation stage
dc.subjectPhaseolus vulgaris
dc.subjectPhenological stage
dc.subjectProductivity performance
dc.subjectWater suppression
dc.subjectYield reduction
dc.subjectPhenols
dc.subjectProductivity
dc.subjectWater supply
dc.subjectIrrigation
dc.titleProductivity and water suppression in different beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) phenological stages
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em evento


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución