dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade Camilo Castelo Branco (UNICASTELO)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:04:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:55:37Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:04:34Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:55:37Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T14:04:34Z
dc.date.issued2012-06-01
dc.identifierArchives of Oral Biology. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd, v. 57, n. 6, p. 704-710, 2012.
dc.identifier0003-9969
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22654
dc.identifier10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.12.002
dc.identifierWOS:000305600900018
dc.identifier0322020541055900
dc.identifier1664688357804299
dc.identifier0053567153623569
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3896250
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The organization of biofilms in the oral cavity gives them added resistance to antimicrobial agents. The action of phenothiazinic photosensitizers on oral biofilms has already been reported. However, the action of the malachite green photosensitizer upon biofilm-organized microorganisms has not been described. The objective of the present work was to compare the action of malachite green with the phenothiazinic photosensitizers (methylene blue and toluidine blue) on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli biofilms.Methods: The biofilms were grown on sample pieces of acrylic resin and subjected to photodynamic therapy using a 660-nm diode laser and photosensitizer concentrations ranging from 37.5 to 3000 mu M. After photodynamic therapy, cells from the biofilms were dispersed in a homogenizer and cultured in Brain Heart Infusion broth for quantification of colony-forming units per experimental protocol. For each tested microorganism, two control groups were maintained: one exposed to the laser radiation without the photosensitizer (L+PS-) and other treated with the photosensitizer without exposure to the red laser light (L-PS+). The results were subjected to descriptive statistical analysis.Results: The best results for S. aureus and E. coli biofilms were obtained with photosensitizer concentrations of approximately 300 mu M methylene blue, with microbial reductions of 0.8-1.0 log(10); 150 mu M toluidine blue, with microbial reductions of 0.9-1.0 log(10); and 3000 mu M malachite green, with microbial reductions of 1.6-4.0 log(10).Conclusion: Greater microbial reduction was achieved with the malachite green photosensitizer when used at higher concentrations than those employed for the phenothiazinic dyes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd
dc.relationArchives of Oral Biology
dc.relation2.050
dc.relation0,752
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectPhotodynamic therapy
dc.subjectMethylene blue
dc.subjectToluidine blue
dc.subjectMalachite green
dc.subjectOral microbiology
dc.titlePhotodynamic inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli biofilms by malachite green and phenothiazine dyes: An in vitro study
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución