dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorRoyal Bot Gardens
dc.contributorInst Pesquisas Jardim Bot Rio de Janeiro
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:21:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T13:05:00Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:21:38Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T13:05:00Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:21:38Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-01
dc.identifierBotanical Journal of The Linnean Society. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 170, n. 2, p. 257-276, 2012.
dc.identifier0024-4074
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/6250
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01282.x
dc.identifierWOS:000308403700008
dc.identifier2952593772868537
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3883435
dc.description.abstractA comparative study of the secondary xylem (wood) anatomy of 11 species (38 specimens) occurring in cerrado s.s. and the adjacent gallery forest (both cerrado s.l. habitat) was made with the aim of identifying the anatomical characteristics of ecological value and correlating them with the environmental conditions. The anatomical features that vary, in general, between the two habitats are: growth ring distinctness (well or poorly defined); tyloses and deposits (more abundant in cerrado specimens); gelatinous fibres (more evident in cerrado specimens and in different patterns between habitats); variation in paratracheal and banded parenchyma (more abundant in cerrado); and more cells per parenchyma strand in cerrado. In general, gallery forest specimens have wider vessels, fewer vessels per square millimetre and larger intervessel pits, indicating more efficient water conduction, whereas cerrado s.s. specimens are the opposite, with low vulnerability and mesomorphy indices, demonstrating greater safety under conditions of water stress. (c) 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, , .
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relationBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society
dc.relation3.124
dc.relation1,352
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectcomparative wood anatomy
dc.subjectecological wood anatomy
dc.subjectsafety versus efficiency
dc.titleA comparison of the wood anatomy of 11 species from two cerrado habitats (cerrado s.s. and adjacent gallery forest)
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución