Development and analysis of an automated performance code checking workflow

Development and analysis of an automated performance code checking workflow

dc.creatorArantes, Eduardo
dc.creatorAndery, Paulo Roberto Pereira
dc.creatorAndrade, Flávio
dc.creatorPaes, Daniel
dc.creatorIrizarry, Javier
dc.date2022-03-17
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-04T22:08:54Z
dc.date.available2022-10-04T22:08:54Z
dc.identifierhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ambienteconstruido/article/view/110923
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3869355
dc.descriptionThis study aimed to evaluate the applicability, accuracy, and challenges involved in the automated checking of design requirements specified by a Performance Code (PC) using a BIM (Building Information Modeling)-enabled model checker software application. Specific goals include: (a) definition of a workflow for the parameterization of a set of computational rules addressing part of the PC design requirements, (b) testing and evaluation of the proposed parameterization using a BIM model of a real large-scale housing project, and (c) comparison of accuracy and checking times between manual and automated methods. The research team developed and tested the automated checking of approximately one-third of the requirements. Findings indicate a substantial checking time decrease and an increase in the number of nonconformities detected through the automated method in comparison to the traditional technique of compliance assessment.en-US
dc.descriptionThis study aimed to evaluate the applicability, accuracy, and challenges involved in the automated checking of design requirements specified by a Performance Code (PC) using a BIM (Building Information Modeling)-enabled model checker software application. Specific goals include: (a) definition of a workflow for the parameterization of a set of computational rules addressing part of the PC design requirements, (b) testing and evaluation of the proposed parameterization using a BIM model of a real large-scale housing project, and (c) comparison of accuracy and checking times between manual and automated methods. The research team developed and tested the automated checking of approximately one-third of the requirements. Findings indicate a substantial checking time decrease and an increase in the number of nonconformities detected through the automated method in comparison to the traditional technique of compliance assessment.pt-BR
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherANTAC - Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construídopt-BR
dc.relationhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ambienteconstruido/article/view/110923/84356
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2022 Ambiente Construídopt-BR
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0pt-BR
dc.sourceAmbiente Construído; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022): Edição Especial Sobre Gestão e Economia da Construção; 27-42en-US
dc.sourceAmbiente Construído; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (2022): Edição Especial Sobre Gestão e Economia da Construção; 27-42es-ES
dc.sourceAmbiente Construído; v. 22 n. 2 (2022): Edição Especial Sobre Gestão e Economia da Construção; 27-42pt-BR
dc.source1678-8621
dc.source1415-8876
dc.subjectVerificação automática de requisitosen-US
dc.subjectNorma de Desempenhoen-US
dc.subjectModelagem da Informação da Construçãoen-US
dc.subjectProjeto de construção baseado em desempenhoen-US
dc.subjectTecnologia de projeto.en-US
dc.titleDevelopment and analysis of an automated performance code checking workflowen-US
dc.titleDevelopment and analysis of an automated performance code checking workflowpt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución