dc.creatorSheila Jorge Selim de Sales
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-05T11:38:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T22:18:14Z
dc.date.available2022-01-05T11:38:17Z
dc.date.available2022-10-03T22:18:14Z
dc.date.created2022-01-05T11:38:17Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.identifier1415-5400
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/39014
dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3125-9125
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3798680
dc.description.abstractThe present study on compared criminal law aims at disseminating, in the Brazilian doctrine, one of the solutions pointed out by italian criminalists to solve the problem of the difficult distinction between dolus eventualis and conscious negligence, especially through the adoption of the concept of recklessness – derived from the Common Law system – as a third form of subjective imputation. After the initial considerations, in order to define the object of study, the article exposes the concept of recklessness, as well as how it emerged, and indicates the italian authors who adopt this concept, nowadays, as a third form of subjective imputation, instead of the dolus eventualis.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherDIR - DEPARTAMENTO DE DIREITO E PROCESSO PENAL
dc.publisherUFMG
dc.relationRevista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectImprudência
dc.subjectTemeridade objetiva
dc.subjectTemeridade subjetiva
dc.subjectDoutrina italiana
dc.subjectDolo eventual
dc.titleAnotações sobre o estudo da recklessness na doutrina penal italiana: por uma terceira forma de imputação subjetiva?
dc.typeArtigo de Periódico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución