Hallazgos epistemológicos en la investigación en gestión aplicando la crítica inmanente, desde el humanismo al currículo humanista

dc.creatorOsejo-Bucheli, Camilo
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-17 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T17:27:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-29T12:13:22Z
dc.date.available2022-01-17 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-06-13T17:27:57Z
dc.date.available2022-09-29T12:13:22Z
dc.date.created2022-01-17 00:00:00
dc.date.created2022-06-13T17:27:57Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-17
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/1938
dc.identifier10.22579/23463910.766
dc.identifier2346-3910
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.22579/23463910.766
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3747305
dc.description.abstractProblemática: las perspectivas epistemológicas de la investigación en gestión, al igual que las de cualquier disciplina, deben revisarse constantemente para identificar oportunidades de avance teórico. La mayoría de las escuelas de gestión en Latinoamérica se suscriben a la corriente de la gestión humanista. La administración de operaciones, siendo un componente del currículo, se origina en una corriente epistemológica diferente. El punto de partida de este artículo es la tensión entre las dos corrientes epistemológicas. Objetivos: confrontar las perspectivas epistemológicas de la investigación en gestión existentes en el currículo de gestión humanista desde sus propios principios y, a partir de esa confrontación, proponer nuevas perspectivas epistemológicas. Materiales y métodos: se usa la exégesis textual para la recolección de la información. También se usa la dialéctica hegeliana, mediante el método de la crítica inmanente, para construir sobre tesis, antítesis y síntesis. Resultados: el artículo encuentra posibles perspectivas epistemológicas de la investigación en gestión y las presenta en lo ontológico, epistemológico y metodológico. Encuentra oportunidades con respecto a lo ontológico en los estudios del proceso y la teoría de sistemas. En cuanto a lo epistemológico, en la historia, la multidisciplinariedad, la territorialidad y la cibernética. En lo metodológico, en los estudios multidisciplinares, los métodos de la filosofía y el panexperiencialismo. Discusión: el artículo aborda la discusión del significado de un estudio humanista y de las humanidades en la investigación en gestión. Conclusiones: existe la necesidad de explorar nuevas posiciones filosóficas en la investigación en gestión desde las definiciones iniciales. Contribución / originalidad: el estudio discute una de las vertientes más relevantes en la epistemología de la investigación en gestión en Latinoamérica.
dc.description.abstractProblem: The epistemological perspectives in management research, as well as in any discipline, must be constantly reviewed to identify opportunities for theoretical advancement. Most management schools in Latin-America subscribe to the humanistic management epistemology, yet operations management, being a part management curricula, identifies with positivism. The starting point of this article is the tension between the two epistemologies in management. Objective: to confront the two seemingly antagonistic epistemological perspectives in management research, coexistent in the humanist management curriculum. Reflecting from the humanistic first principles, to propose new epistemological perspectives. Materials and methods: The article uses textual exegesis for data collection, and Hegelian dialectics applying the method of immanent critique, building on, theses-antithesis- synthesis for data analisys. Results: The article finds possible epistemological perspectives for management research, and presents them in the ontological, epistemological, and methodological levels. It finds research opportunities regarding ontology, in process studies, and systems theory. Regarding epistemology, it finds opportunities in the study of history, multidisciplinary studies, territoriality, and cybernetics. Methodologically it unveils opportunities for research in the application of the methods of philosophy, and panexperientialism. Discussion: The study discusses the meaning of humanities in management studies. Conclusions: The need to explore new philosophical positions in management research from the initial definitions. Contribution/originality: This study discusses one of the relevant epistemological perspectives in Latin-American management.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Llanos
dc.relationAaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151897
dc.relationAktouf, O. (2002). El Simbolismo y la “Cultura Organizacional” De los abusos conceptuales a las lecciones de campo. AD-minister, (1), 63-93. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7024461
dc.relationAktouf, O. & Holford, W. (2009). The implications of humanism for business studies. En H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan & E. Von Kimakowitz (Eds.), Humanism in Business (pp. 101-122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808395.008
dc.relationAktouf, O., Chenoufi, M. & Holford, W. (2005). The False Expectations of Michael Porter's Strategic Management Framework. Problems and Perspectives in Management 3(4), 181-200. https://acortar.link/WkiX7N
dc.relationAllen, M. R. D. (2019). God, Ontology and Management: A Philosophical Praxis. Philosophy of Management 18(3), 303-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-018-0101-6
dc.relationAntonio, R. J. (1981). Immanent Critique as the Core of Critical Theory: Its Origins and Developments in Hegel, Marx and Contemporary Thought. The British Journal of Sociology, 32(3), 330-345. https://doi.org/10.2307/589281
dc.relationAppadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization (Vol. 1). University of Minnesota Press. https://acortar.link/ThZL3D
dc.relationArciniega García, L. (2019). Humanismo y Germanías: la decoración del palacio condal de Oliva11. Hispanic Research Journal, 20(5), 451-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682737.2019.1734341
dc.relationArnould, E. J. & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868-882. https://doi.org/10.1086/426626
dc.relationAudi, R. (1999). Diccionario Akal de Filosofía. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationBeer, S. (1984). The Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology. J Oper Res Soc, 35(1), 7–25 https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1984.2
dc.relationBarnard, C. I. (1968). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press. https://bit.ly/3toWxPm
dc.relationBooth, C. & Rowlinson, M. (2006). Management and organizational history: Prospects. Management & Organizational History, 1(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935906060627 Brockmeyer, E., Halstrøm, H., Jensen, A. & Erlang, A. (1948). The Life and Works of A.K. Erlang. University of Michigan.
dc.relationBrunet, M., Fachin, F. & Langley, A. (2021). Studying Projects Processually. International Journal of Project Management, 39(8), 834-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.10.006.
dc.relationBurrell, G. & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Heinemann Educational Books. https://acortar.link/sApQdy
dc.relationChanlat, A. & Bedard, R. (1991). Managing in the Quebec style: originality and vulnerability. International Studies of Management & Organization, 21(3), 10-37.
dc.relationChanlat, A. & Soto, B. M. (1996 ). El oficio del dirigente: ¿“gran empresario” o “buen dirigente”? Cuadernos de Administración, 15(23), 111-118.
dc.relationCook, A., Blom, H., Lillo, F., Nunzio, R., Miccichè, S., Rivas, D., Vázquez, R. & Zanin, M. (2015). Applying complexity science to air traffic management. Journal of Air Transport Management, 42, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.09.011
dc.relationDantzig, G. (1982). Reminiscences about the origins of linear programming. Operations Research Letters, 1(2), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6377(82)90043-8
dc.relationDe Courcelles, D. (2019). La divulgación humanista de los saberes: lo que el viento se llevó. Desde Pedro Mexía a Michel de Montaigne en la Europa del siglo XVI. Hipogrifo, 7(2), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.13035/H.2019.07.02.30
dc.relationDesmond, M. (2012). On Not knowing Greek: Leonzio Pilatus's Rendition of the Iliad and the Translatio of Mediterranean Identities. En E. Campbell & R. Mills (Eds.), Rethinking Medieval Translation: Ethics, Politics, Theory (pp. 21-40). Boydell and Brewer.
dc.relationDurant, W. (1953). The Renaissance. The Story of Civilization: Part V. Simon & Schuster.
dc.relationDurugbo, C. M., Anouze, A. L., Amoudi, O. & Al-Balushi, Z. (2021). Competitive priorities for regional operations: a Delphi study. Production Planning & Control, 32(15), 1295-1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1805809
dc.relationDussel, E. (2013). Filosofía de la liberación – Obras selectas XI – (1.a ed.). Docencia. https://www.enriquedussel.com/txt/Textos_Obras_Selectas/(F)11.Fillosofia_liberacion.pdf
dc.relationEasterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., Jackson, P. & Jaspersen, L. J. (2018). Management & Business Research (6.a ed.). SAGE.
dc.relationEriksson, D. & Engström, A. (2021). Using critical realism and abduction to navigate theory and data in operations and supply chain management research. Supply Chain Management, 26(2), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2020-0091
dc.relationErlang, A. (1909). The Theory of Probabilities and Telephone Conversations. Nyt. Tidsskr. Mat. Ser. B, 20, 33-39. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3M9HQYS
dc.relationFayol, H., Coubrough, J. A. & International Management Institute. (1930). Industrial and General Administration. Translated by J.A. Coubrough. Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.
dc.relationFollet, M. P. (1918). The New State. University Park: Penn State Press.
dc.relationFrosh, S. & Emerson, P. D. (2005). Interpretation and over-interpretation: disputing the meaning of texts. Qualitative Research, 5(3), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105054457
dc.relationGarud, R., Jarzabkowski, P., Langley, A., Tsoukas, H., Van de Ven, A. & Lê, J. (2020). "Process Research Methods: A Conversation among Leading Scholars*". En Crook, T.R., Lê, J. & Smith, A.D. (Eds.), Advancing Methodological Thought and Practice (vol. 12, pp. 117-132). Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-838720200000012019
dc.relationGeels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
dc.relationGeraldi, J., Maylor, H. & Williams, T. (2011). Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31(9), 966-990. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111165848
dc.relationGilbreth, F. & Gilbreth, L. M. (1917). Applied motion study a collection of papers on the efficient method to industrial preparedness. Sturgis & Walton Company.
dc.relationGilbreth, F. B. (1909). Bricklaying system. The MC Clark Publishing Company.
dc.relationGilbreth, F. B. & Kent, R. T. (1911). Motion study: a method for increasing the efficiency of the workman. D. Van Nostrand Company.
dc.relationGonzáles-Miranda, D. R. & Rojas-Rojas, W. (2020). Editorial. Repensando la crítica en los estudios organizacionales. Innovar, 30(78), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n78.90295
dc.relationGrassl, W. & Habisch, A. (2011). Ethics and economics: Towards a New Humanistic Synthesis for Business. J Bus Ethics, 99(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0747-7
dc.relationHavu, K. (2019). Ethos, authority and worldly reputation in the Erasmian Republic of Letters. Renaissance Studies, 33(5), 789-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/rest.12543
dc.relationHegel, G. W. F. (2014). Science of logic. Routledge.
dc.relationHolmström, J., Hameri, A.-P. & Ketokivi, M. (2006). Operations management as a problem-solving discipline. Proceedings, B1-B6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2006.27175141 https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/articles-85932_archivo_pdf.pdf
dc.relationInternational Federation of Operational Research Societies. (2020, 12 de abril). What is OR. https://www.ifors.org/what-is-or/
dc.relationInternational Humanistic Management Association. (2020, 12 de noviembre). Art for Humanizing Management Seminar with Dr. Jyoti Bachani [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFxtdb-iEGE&t=2131s
dc.relationJackson, T. (2002). Reframing human resource management in Africa: A cross-cultural perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(7), 998-1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190210131267
dc.relationKast, F. E. & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1972). General Systems Theory: Applications for Organization and Management. AMJ, 15(4), 447-465. https://doi.org/10.5465/255141
dc.relationKozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
dc.relationLee, S., Lovelace, K. & Manz, C. (2014). Serving with spirit: An integrative model of workplace spirituality within service organizations. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 11(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2013.801023
dc.relationLobato Calleros, O., Chanlat, A., Bédard, R. & Ramírez, G. (2014). Autopietic decisions approach: a governance research network case study. The TQM Journal, 26(4), 382-394. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2014-0011
dc.relationLuhmann, N. (2017). Evolution of science. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201752240
dc.relationMarkov, A. (1971). Extension of the limit theorems of probability theory to a sum of variables connected in a chain. John Wiley and Sons.
dc.relationMarsh, D. (2013). Cicero in the Renaissance. En Steel, C. (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (pp. 306 - 317). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139048750.020
dc.relationMayo, E. (1934). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. Nature, 134, 201. https://www.nature.com/articles/134201b0
dc.relationMelé, D. (2003a). The Challenge of Humanistic Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023298710412
dc.relationMelé, D. (2003b). Organizational Humanizing Cultures: Do They Generate Social Capital? Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1/2), 3-14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25075051
dc.relationMeredith, J.R., Raturi, A., Amoako-Gyampah, K. & Kaplan, B. (1989). Alternative research paradigms in operations. Journal of Operations Management, 8(4), 297-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8
dc.relationMinisterio de Educación. (2003, 13 de noviembre). Resolución número 2767 de 2003. Por la cual se definen las características específicas de calidad para los programas de pregrado en Administración.
dc.relationMonreal Pérez, J. L. (2011). Juan Luis Vives, lengua y lenguaje en el humanismo renacentista. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, 28, 101-133. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev-ASHF.2011.v28.36281
dc.relationMontaño Hirose, L. (2020). Encrucijadas y desafíos de los Estudios Organizacionales Una reflexión desde las perspectivas institucionales. Innovar, 30(78), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n78.90304
dc.relationMünsterberg, H. (1913). Psychologie und Wirtschaftsleben. The Riverside Cambridge. Nadworny, M. (1957). Frederick Taylor and Frank Gilbreth: Competition in Scientific Management. Business History Review, 31(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3111727
dc.relationOsejo-Bucheli , C. (2021b). Hacia una filosofía de la administración centrada en el carácter. Revista de Filosofía, Centro de Estudios Filosóficos "Dr. Adolfo García Díaz", facultad de Humanidades y Educación, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo – Venezuela, 38(98), 715-743. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5528973
dc.relationOsejo-Bucheli, C. (2021a). Demostración lógica sobre coherencia de filosofía de la ciencia y métodos cualitativos de investigaciónen gestión. Revista Educación En Ingeniería, 16(32), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.26507/rei.v16n32.1191
dc.relationOsejo-Bucheli, C. (2022a). Globalization fractal effect: theory testing through macro-ethnographic observation of deterritorialization in Colombian social uprisings [working paper].
dc.relationOsejo-Bucheli, C. (2022b). Theory evaluation and formulation: a reply to Ludic Theory through A.N.Whitehead´s Aesthetic Experience. Philosophy of Management, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00194-4
dc.relationParello, V. (2008). The anti-Jewish apologetics of Juan Luis Vives (1543). Between faith and reason. Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez, 38(2), 171-187+322+318+314. https://doi.org/10.4000/mcv.3959
dc.relationPareto, V. (1916). Trattato di sociologia generale (vol. 1). Firenze: G. Barbera, Editore. https://archive.org/details/ParetoTrattatoDiSociologiaGeneraleVol1/mode/2up
dc.relationPascal, B. (1852). pensées. Dezobry et E. Magdeleine.
dc.relationPirson, M. & Lawrence, P. R. (2010). Humanism in Business - Towards a Paradigm Shift? J Bus Ethics, 93, 553-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0239-1
dc.relationPirson, M. & Malhotra, D. (2011). Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders? Organization Science, 22(4), 1087-1104. https://doi.org/10.2307/20868912
dc.relationPirson, M., Bachani, J. & Blomme, R. J. (2018). Humanistic Management: Social Entrepreneurship and Mindfulness, Volume II: Foundations, Cases, and Exercises. Business Expert Press. https://digitalcommons.stmarys-ca.edu/school-economics-business-faculty-works/484/
dc.relationPrat, S. (2017). La réception des Académiques dans les Essais: une manière voisine et inavouée de faire usage du doute sceptique. En: Smith, P. & Charles S. (Eds.), Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées (vol 221). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45424-5_2
dc.relationPrelinger Archives. (2021, 06 de marzo). Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/prelinger
dc.relationReed, M. (2006). Organizational Theorizing: A Historically Contested Terrain. En S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy & T. B. Lawrence, The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 19-54). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608030.n2
dc.relationRogers, C. R. (1942). Counseling and psychotherapy; newer concepts in practice. Houghton Mifflin. Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., & Wilson, J. (2012). Business research methods. Financial Times (6.a ed.). FT Prentice Hall.
dc.relationSavitski, S. (2019). Idleness and freedom in Michel de Montaigne’s “essays”. Philosophical Literary Journal Logos, 29(1), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2019-1-189-200
dc.relationShewhart, W. (1931). Economic control of quality of manufactured product. Van Nostrand.
dc.relationSmith, J. H. (1998 ). The Enduring Legacy of Elton Mayo. Human Relations, 51(3), 221-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679805100302
dc.relationSpitzeck, H., Pirson, M., Amann, W. Khan, S., von Kimakowitz, E. (Eds.) (2009). Humanism in business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationSteinberg, J. (2020). Politics as a model of pedagogy in Spinoza. Ethics and Education, 15(2), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2020.1731657
dc.relationSteiner, G. (2013, 22 de febrero). Universitas? [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyAqh4-18nQ Swann, T. & Stoborod, K. (2014). Did you hear the one about the anarchist manager? Ephimera, 14(4), 591-609. https://bit.ly/3hvGlpN
dc.relationSwann, T. R. (2016). Anarchist Cybernetics: Control and Communication in Radical Left Social Movements (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester).
dc.relationSwann, T. (2017). Information, cybernetics and the second industrial revolution. Ephemera, 17(2), 457. https://bit.ly/35p6vIv
dc.relationSwann, T. (2018). Towards an anarchist cybernetics: Stafford Beer, self-organisation and radical social movements. Ephemeta Theory & Politics in Organization, 18(3), 427-456. https://bit.ly/3tqwHKG
dc.relationSwann, T. (2020). Anarchist Cybernetics: Control and Communication in Radical Politics. Policy Press.
dc.relationTaylor, F. W. (1903). Shop management, by Frederick Winslow Taylor, with an introduction by Henry R. Towne. Harper & Brothers Publishers. http://www.public-library.uk/pdfs/8/290.pdf
dc.relationTaylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper & Brothers Publishers.
dc.relationTaylor, F. & Fayol, H. (1981). Principios de la administración científica. Ateneo. https://bit.ly/3Mgzsqr
dc.relationTead, O. (1929). Human Nature and Management: The applications of Psychology to Executive Leadership. McGraw Hill. https://bit.ly/3Hznchu
dc.relationTowill, D. R. (2010). Industrial engineering the Toyota Production System. Journal of Management History, 16(3), 327-345. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511341011051234
dc.relationVan Fraassen, B. C. (1985). 11. Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science. En Churchland, P. M. & Hooker, C. A., Images of science: Essays on realism and empiricism, with a reply from Bas C. van Fraassen. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://acortar.link/ve54Cv
dc.relationVarela, E. (2018). La Hegemonía del Management. Una genealogía del poder managerial. Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolivar.
dc.relationVives, J. L. (1525). Introductio ad sapientiam (introducción a la sabiduría). Lovaina. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). The History and Status of General Systems Theory. AMJ, 15(4), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.5465/255139
dc.relationWhitehead, A. N. (1919). The Concept of Nature. The Tarner Lectures Delivered in Trinity College November 1919. Dover Publications, INC. https://acortar.link/NeSnqr
dc.relationWhitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality, an essay in cosmology. The Free Press.
dc.relationWhitehead, T. N. (1938). The Industrial Worker: A Statistical Study of Human Relations in a Group of Manual Workers, Volume II. Harvard University Press.
dc.relationWhitehead, T. N. (2013). Leadership in a free society: A Study in Human Relations Based on an Analysis of Present-Day Industrial Civilization. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674593725
dc.relationhttps://revistageon.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/geon/article/download/766/874
dc.relationhttps://revistageon.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/geon/article/download/766/875
dc.relationNúm. 1 , Año 2022 : Revista Geon Vol 9 No 1 enero junio 2022
dc.relation766
dc.relation1
dc.relation9
dc.relationRevista GEON (Gestión, Organizaciones y Negocios)
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsCamilo Osejo-Bucheli - 2022
dc.sourcehttps://revistageon.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/geon/article/view/766
dc.subjectBinders
dc.subjectmeat cuts
dc.subjectrestructured meat
dc.subjectligantes
dc.subjectaglutinantes
dc.subjectrecortes de carne
dc.subjectcarne reestructurada
dc.titleHallazgos epistemológicos en la investigación en gestión aplicando la crítica inmanente, desde el humanismo al currículo humanista
dc.typeArtículo de Reflexión
dc.typeReflection Article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución