Sistematización de experiencias: el informe pericial visto desde la jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia
Fecha
2019-07-08Registro en:
Gutiérrez, N. (2019). Sistematización de experiencias: el informe pericial visto desde la jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia. Universidad Santo Tomás. Bogotá, Colombia.
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
instname:Universidad Santo Tomás
Autor
Gutiérrez Parra, Nathalia
Institución
Resumen
Forensic psychologists have an active and significant participation in the judicial field, since the forensic psychological expert report can contribute to the clarification of the facts that are debated in the processes or provide scientific and technical knowledge unrelated to the Judge, which in some events It has been of vital importance for the taking of judicial decisions. In Psycho-Juridical I practice, twelve sentences of the Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia - Criminal Appeals Chamber on sexual crimes in minors were analyzed, in them the Court has pronounced on the quality of expert, the importance of the technical base scientific report, the characteristics that should have the opinions in cases of sexual crimes, among others. In the analysis of the judgments, it was evident that the Court has observed flaws in the expert opinions. Hence, the objective of Practice II was the preparation of an expert report protocol, with observance of the aspects referred by the High Court in the judgments mentioned, in order to generate a tool that professionals can use as a reference for their expert reports. The central question for the systematization of experience, within a psycho-legal context, was the following: Why is it important for the forensic psychologist to know the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice regarding psychological forensic expert reports? The instruments for collecting information were: the field diary, four semi-structured interviews and the SWOT matrix.