Caracterización socioeconómica y ambiental de la cuenca media del río Neusa en el marco de la metodología PSA

dc.contributorVargas Osorio, Juan José
dc.contributorÁlvarez Berrio, Johan Alexander
dc.contributorRamírez Díaz, Germán Amilkar
dc.contributorhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=tg9vauEAAAAJ&hl=es
dc.contributorhttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?
dc.creatorVásquez Cabrera, Natalia
dc.creatorRoncancio Hernández, Edgar Johnatan
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T15:21:10Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T15:21:10Z
dc.date.created2018-09-24T15:21:10Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifierVásquez, N., & Roncancio, E. J. (2018). Caracterización socioeconómica y ambiental de la cuenca media del río Neusa en el marco de la metodología PSA (Trabajo de grado de pregrado de Ingeniería Ambiental). Universidad Santo Tomás. Bogotá, Colombia.
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/13247
dc.identifierT.I.A R76ca 2018
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co
dc.description.abstractThe present work shows information related to Payment Schedule for Ecosystem Services (PSE) both at Colombian and international levels. Here we pretended to emphasize applicative and theoretical aspects based in the information collected from published information concerning PSE. The methodology used here consisted in the use of search equations systems powered by keyword conjugation referring to PSE. The results of this investigation permitted to identify the particularities found between countries in the application of this schedule. Also, a consistent theoretical framework offered the tool for the correct implementation of such schemes in different regions regardless the Ecosystem Services offered by the environment there found.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.publisherPregrado de Ingeniería Ambiental
dc.publisherFacultad de Ingeniería Ambiental
dc.relationAKHMAD, F., & ZUZY, A. (2013). The complexity of the institution of payment for environmental services: A case study of two Indonesian PES schemes. Ecosystem Services 6, 54-63.
dc.relationALMANZA, C. A., SÁNCHEZ, R. D., & WUNDER, S. (2010). Pagos por Servicios Ambientales en Marcha: La Experiencia en la Microcuenca de Chaina, Departamento de Boyacá, Colombia. Colombia: Centro para la Investigación Forestal Internacional. 60p.
dc.relationASQUITHA, N. M., VARGAS, M. T., & WUNDER, S. (2008). Selling two environmental services: In-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecological Economics, 675 – 684.
dc.relationBALLESTERO, M. R., & RODRIGUEZ, A. F. (2008). Diseño y gestión adaptativa de un programa de pagos por servicios ecosistémicos en Copán Ruinas, Honduras. Costa Rica: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA).
dc.relationBARTON, D., FAITH, D., RUSCH, G., ACEVEDO, H., PANIAGUA, L., & CASTRO, M. (2009). Environmental service payments: Evaluating biodiversity conservation trade-offs and cost-efficiency in the Osa Conservation Area, Costa Rica. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 901-911.
dc.relationBENNETT, D. E., GOSNELL, H., LURIE, S., & DUNCAN, S. (2014). Utility engagement with payments for watershed services in the United States. Ecosystem Services 8, 56 - 64.
dc.relationBINET, T., FAILLER, P., P. N., & MAYIF, M. A. (2013). First international payment for marine ecosystem services: The case of the Banc d’Arguin National Park, Mauritania. Global Environmental Change 23, 1434– 1443.
dc.relationBLACKMAN, A., & RICHARD, W. (2010). User financing in a national payments for environmental services program: Costa Rican hydropower. Ecological Economics 69, 1626–1638.
dc.relationBORNER, J., MENDOZA, A., & STEPHEN, V. (2007). Ecosystem services, agriculture, and rural poverty in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon: Interrelationships and policy prescriptions. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 64, 356 - 373.
dc.relationBORNER, J., WUNDER, S., & ARMAS, A. (2011). Pagos por Carbono en America Latina: de la experiencia de proyectos piloto a la implementación a gran escala. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros N° 228, 115 - 137.
dc.relationBORNER, J., WUNDER, S., WERTZ-KANOUNNIKOFF, S., TITO, M., PEREIRA, L., & NASCIMENTO, N. (2010). Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity implications. Ecological Economics 69 , 1272–1282.
dc.relationCAMACHO, C. D. (2008). Esquemas de pagos por servicios ambientales para la conservación de cuencas hidrográficas en el Ecuador. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 54 - 66.
dc.relationCASAS, A., & MARTINEZ, R. (2008). MARCOS LEGALES PARA EL PAGO POR SERVICIOS AMBIENTALES EN AMERICA LATINA Y EL CARIBE: Análisis de ocho paises. Washington, DC.: Secretaría General de la Organización de los Estados Americanos. Departamento de Desarrollo Sostenible.
dc.relationCASASOLA, F., IBRAHIM, M., RAMIREZ, E., VILLANUEVA, C., SEPULVEDA, C., & ARAYA, J. (2006). Pago por servicios ambientales y cambios en los usos de la tierra en paisajes dominados por la ganadería en el trópico subhúmedo de Nicaragua y Costa Rica. Agroforestería en las Américas N º 45.
dc.relationCRANFORD, M., & MOURATO, S. (2014). Credit-Based Payments for Ecosystem Services: Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Ecuador. El Sevier World Development, Vol. 64, pp. 503–520.
dc.relationDIAZ, A. M., & RENNER, I. (2007). Gestión Integral de Cuencas. La experiencia del Proyecto Regional Cuencas Andinas. Perú: Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP).
dc.relationFIETCHER, R., & BREITLING, J. (2012). Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica. Geoforum 43 , 402-411.
dc.relationFONAFIFO, CONAFOR, & Ecuador, M. d. (2012). Lecciones aprendidas para REDD+ desde los programas de pago por servicios ambientales e incentivos para la conservación. Ejemplos de Costa Rica, México y Ecuador. El Banco Internacional de Reconstrucción y Fomento/El Banco Mundial, PP. 176.
dc.relationFONSECA, S. A. (2006). El café de smbra: un ejemplo de pago de servicios ambientales para proteger la biodiversidad. México D.F: Gaceta Ecológica. Instituto Nacional de Ecologia.
dc.relationFRANCISCO, J. R., & BUDDS, J. (2014). Payments for environmental services and control over conservation of natural resources: The role of public and private sectors in the conservation of the Nima watershed, Colombia. Ecological Economics, 295–302.
dc.relationFUNDACIÓN NATURA. (2008). “Small Addition to the Water Bill, Big Step for Conservation: Fund Creation. Santa Cruz, Bolivia: NATURALIA summer newsletter.
dc.relationGARCIA, L. A., PÉREZ, M. R., & GARCIA, S. B. (2013). Motivation for conservation: Assessing integrated conservation and development projects and payments for environmental services in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics, 92 - 100.
dc.relationGARCIA-AMADO, L. R., PÉREZ, M. R., ESCUTIA, F. R., GARCÍA, S. B., & MEJIA, E. C. (2011). Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics, 2361–2368.
dc.relationGRAMMATIKOPOLOU, I., POUTA, E., & SALMIOVIRTA, M. (2013). A locally designed payment scheme for agricultural landscape services. Land Use Policy 32, 175 - 185.
dc.relationGREIBER, T. (2010). Pagos por Servicios Ambientales. Marcos Jurídicos e Institucionales. Gland, Suiza: UICN, xviii + 318 pp.
dc.relationGROOT, R. B., & HERMANS, L. M. (2009). Broadening the picture: Negotiating payment schemes for water-related environmental services in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 68, 2760 - 2767.
dc.relationLU, Y., & HE, T. (2014). Assessing the effects of regional payment for watershed services program on water quality using an intervention analysis model. Science of the Total Environment 493, 1056–1064.
dc.relationMALAVASI, E. O., MORA, L. F., & CARVAJAL, C. B. (2013). mpacto del Programa de Pago de Servicios Ambientales en Costa Rica como medio de reducción de la pobreza en los medios rurales. Unidad Regional de Asistencia Técnica., 62 p.
dc.relationMANSON, R. H. (2004). Los servicios hidrológicos y la conservación de los bosques de México. Madera y Bosques 10, 3 - 20.
dc.relationMIRANDA, M., PORRAS, I., & MORENO, M. L. (2003). The social impacts of payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. A quantitative field survey and analysis of the Virilla watershed. London: International Institute for Environment and Development .
dc.relationMONTSERRAT, A., & WUNDER, S. (2007). Decentralized Payments for Environmental Services: Comparing the Cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecuador: Ecological Economics.
dc.relationMuradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., & May, P. H. (2010). Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69 , 1202–1208.
dc.relationNARLOCHA, U., PASCUALi, U., & DRUCKERD, A. G. (2013). How to achieve fairness in payments for ecosystem services?Insights from agrobiodiversity conservation auctions. Land Use Policy 35, 107 - 118.
dc.relationOLUYEDE, A., KELSEY, J., & BERIA, L. (2012). Auction Design for the Private Provision of Public Goods in Developing Countries: Lessons from Payments for Environmental Services in Malawi and Indonesia. World Development Vol. 40, 1213–1223.
dc.relationPAGIOLA, S. (2008). Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 65, 712 - 724.
dc.relationPEREVOCHTCHIKOVA, M., NEGRETE, I., & ROJO, A. (2015, Mexico ). The perceptions about payment schemes for ecosystem services: Study case of the San Miguel and Santo Tomás Ajusco community, Mexico. Ecosystem Services , 27 - 36.
dc.relationPETTERSSON, J. (2010). Payments for Environmental Services in the Campohermoso watershed. Measuring opportunity costs and identifying determinants. Bogota: School of Business, Economics and Law, University of GothenburgSchool of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg.
dc.relationPIÑA, C. M., RIVERA, M., CISNEROS, A., & GARCIA, H. (2011). Retos de la focalización del Programa de Pago por Servicios Ambientales en Mexico. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros N° 228, 87 - 113.
dc.relationPIRARD, R. (2012). Payments for Environmental Services (PES) in the public policy landscape: "Mandatory" spices in the Indonesian recipe. Ecological Economics , 23-29.
dc.relationPORRAS, I., AYLWARD, B., & DENGEL, J. (2013). Monitoring and evaluation of Payment for Watershed Service Schemes in developing countries. London, London: IIED.
dc.relationPRAGERA, K., REED, M., & SCOTTT, A. (2012). Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale— Rethinking agri-environmental payments. Land Use Policy 29, 244– 249.
dc.relationROBERTSON, N., & WUNDER, S. (2005). Fresh Tracks in the Forest: Assessing Incipient Payments for Environmental Services Initiatives in Bolivia. Bogor, Indonesia: Centro de Investigación Forestal Internacional.
dc.relationSIERRA, R., & RUSSMAN, E. (2006). On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 59, 131 - 141.
dc.relationSOMMERVILLE, M., JONES, J. P., RAHAJAHARISON, M., & MILNER, G. (2010). The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community based Payment for Environmental Services interventions: A case study from Menabe, Madagascar. Ecological Economics 69, 1262–1271.
dc.relationSTEFANO, P., SVEN, W., & STEFANIE, E. (2008). Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 65, 834 - 852.
dc.relationWUNDER, S. (2005). Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
dc.relationWUNSCHERA, T., ENGELB, S., & WUNDER, S. (2008). Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: A tool for boosting conservation benefits. Ecological EconomicsS 65, 822 - 833.
dc.relationZANELLA, M., SCHLEYER, C., & SPEELMAN, S. (2014). Why do farmers join Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes? An Assessment of PES water scheme participation in Brazil. Ecological Economics 105 , 166 - 176.
dc.relationZAPATA, A., MURGUEITIO, E., MEJÍA, C., ZULUAGA, A. F., & MUHAMMAD, I. (2007). Efecto del pago por servicios ambientales en la adopción de sistemas silvopastoriles en paisajes ganaderos de la cuenca media del río La Vieja, Colombia. 86 - 92: Agroforestería en las Américas Nº 45.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleCaracterización socioeconómica y ambiental de la cuenca media del río Neusa en el marco de la metodología PSA


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución