Influencia de la corte IDH en la figura de justicia rogada en la jurisdicción contenciosa administrativa

Abstract

The Colombian State, signed on November 22, 1969, the Pact of San José of Costa Rica, which is also known as the American Convention on Human Rights. This convention contains and defines the full range of human rights that must be respected both nationally and internationally by the signatory States, as well as the instruments and tools available to guarantee their respect. This convention brought with it two organizations to learn about the violations of human rights recognized in the Agreement: the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The latter, in the exercise of its functions has issued sentences that have served as inspiration for the Council of State as the highest body of the contentious administrative jurisdiction to modulate and clarify the deep-rooted condition that this jurisdiction has: pledged justice; and with this, in the process and ruling of the processes of direct repair is taking a significant turn from the late twentieth century and the beginning of the XXI, with respect to the line it had marked since its inception. he analyzes of the judgments of both, the Council of State on its different periods and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, will determine how the second ones have influenced the figure of the pledged justice in the contentious administrative jurisdiction.