La reforma a la justicia sería la solución a la emisión tardía de sentencias

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to establish the origin and consequences of the different sentences in the Colombian administrative jurisdiction. In accordance with the above, it is clear that in the development of the judicial process and in each of the procedures established in the current regulations, specific terms are established, to resolve the conflicts that have been brought before the contentious jurisdiction. Likewise, it is worth asking if these terms are strictly complied with by the agents administering justice, or if in day-to-day practice, those terms are extended without judicial agents being able to avoid it, or due to circumstances other than Failure to comply with the provisions of the Code of Administrative Procedure and administrative litigation, unwarranted delays in performing the judicial function; In addition, there are other factors, such as judicial congestion, and other situations that further delay the decision-making process, such as the victim's exclusive fault, judicial error, among others. All this leads us to seek the answer to our research problem, and is to know if there is any title of imputation to the state as a failure of the service or improper functioning of the administration of justice, which would give rise to state responsibility.