masterThesis
Developing reading comprehension through graphic organizers in CLIL
Fecha
2017-05-05Registro en:
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Anderson, G. (2006). “ Be sensitive … to both intensive and extensive reading .” Cambridge
University Press, 1–3.
Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart &
Winston
Ballou, A. K. (2012). Using Explicit Strategy Instruction to Improve Reading Comprehension
Using Explicit Strategy Instruction to Improve Reading Comprehension. St. John Fisher
College
Bellanca, J. (2007). Graphic organizers: tools for lifelong thinking and learning. In A guide to
graphic organizers: helping students organize and process content for deeper learning (p.
196). California: Corwin Press.
Bentley, K. (2010). The TKT Course: CLIL Module. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
Bernhardt, B. (2010). Using Graphic Organizers to Enhance Reading Comprehension.
University of California.
Bin, A., & Amin, M. (2004). ITE TEACHERS ’ CONFERENCE 2004 USING GRAPHIC
ORGANIZERS Paper Presented by, 1–16.
Bromley, K. (2008). From drawing to digital creations: graphic organizers in the classroom. In
Research on Teaching Literacy through the Communicative and Visual Arts. New York:
Routledge
Bromley, K., Irwin-De Vitis, L., & Modlo, M. (1995). Graphic Organizers. New York:
Scholastic Professional Books
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambrridge:
Cambridge Universtiy Press.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. New York: Rouledge.
Bustamante, T. (2014). The Use of Graphic Organizers to Improve Reading Comprehension in a
Pre-Intermediate EFL Class at Sagrados Corazones High School.
Charmaz, K. (2015). Grounded Theory. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A
Practical Guide to Research Methods (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications
Colombo, M., & Furbush, D. (2009). Teaching English Language Learners Content and
Language in Middle and Secondary Mainstream Classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE
Publications.
Council of Europe. (2001). The Common European framework of reference for languages:
Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culbert, E., Flood, M., & Winder, R. (1998). Qualitative Investigation of the Use of Graphic
Organizers.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL)
Classrooms. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins
Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smith, U. (2010). Language Use and Language Learning in
CLIL Classrooms. (C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smith, Eds.). Amsterdam, The
Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Darmawan, F. (2010). Optimizing Graphic Organizers To Improve Students’ Reading
Comprehension. Sebelas Maret University
Delrose, L. (2011). Investigating the Use of Graphic Organizers for Writing. Louisiana State
University.
Drapeau, P. (1998). Great teaching with graphic organizers: Lessons and fun-shaped templates
that motivate kids of all learning styles. New York: Scholastic Professional Books
Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L. H., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of
cognitive modifiability: The Learning Propensity Assessment Device: Theory, instruments,
and techniques. Jerusalem: ICELP Press
Fowler, F. (2014). Survey research methods. 2014 (Vol. 5th). Boston: SAGE Publications.
Goss, P. (2009). The Influence of Graphic Organizers on Students’ ability to Summarize and
Comprehend Science Content regarding the Earth’s Changing Surface. B.S. Florida International University.
Hahn, C. (2008). Doing qualitative research using your computer; A practical guide. Doing
Qualitative Research Using Your Computer; A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications
Ltd
Halvorson, C. (2010). The Effects of Using Graphic Organizers with 6th Grade.
Hamilton, G. (2005). Content-Area Graphic Organizers for Science. Portland: Weston Walch.
Harris, T. L., Hodges, R. E., & Association, I. R. (1995). The literacy dictionary : the vocabulary
of reading and writing. Vocabulary of reading and writing.
Jiang, X. (2012). Effects of Discourse Structure Graphic Organizers on EFL Reading
Comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(1), 84–105
Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2007). · Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings
and issues.
Llumiquinga, M. (2011). The Use of Graphic Organizers to Improve Reading Comprehension Skills with Students Of I-II Intensive Courses.
Mahecha, R., Urrego, S., & Lozano, E. (2009). Improving Eleventh Graders’ Reading
Comprehension Through Text Coding and Double Entry Organizer Reading Strategies.
McKernan, J. (1996). Curriculum Action Research - a Handbook of Methods and Resources for
the Reflective Practitioner (Second Edi). London: Kogan Page Limited
McKown, B., & Barnett, C. (2007). Improving Reading Comprehension through Higher-Order
Thinking Skills.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Qualitative Data Analysis and Narrative Structure. In
Research in education: a conceptual introduction (p. 684). New Jersey: Pearson.
Millet, C. (2000). The Effects of Graphic Organizers on Reading Comprehension Achievement of
Second Grade Students.
Mohan, B., & van Naerssen, M. (1997). Understanding cause-effect. Learning through language.
English Teaching Forum.
Mora, C. (2014). The Influence of Graphic Organizers in A1 Sixth Graders’ Argumentative Writing Skill in an EFL Context. Universidad de la Sabana.
Nguyen, S. (2009). The Effects of Graphic Organizers on Third Grade Students’ Narrative
Writing.
Novak, J. (2010). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Mapas as Facilitative
Tools in Schools and Corporations (Vol. 2nd). New York: Routledge.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. New York:
Prentice-Hall.
Nuttal, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford: Heinemann English
Language Teaching.
Ogle, D., & Blachowicz, C. L. Z. (2002). Beyond literature circles: Helping students
comprehend informational texts. Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best
Practices, 259–274
Okanlawon, A. (2011). Using Appropriate Strategies to Improve Students ’ Comprehension of
Chemistry Texts : A Guide for Chemistry Teachers. International Multidisciplinary
Journal, Ethiopia, 5(21), 214–230.
Öztürk, Ö. (2012). The Effects of Graphic Organizers on Reading Comprehension Achievement of EFL Learners.
Pinkley, D. (1994). Children Learning English as a Foreign Language CLIL : Content and
Language Integrated Learning CLIL : A Definition CLIL : Dimensions and Focus
Reina, M. (2013). Impact of the Application of Reading Strategies on the Development of
Intensive Reading Comprehension in a Content-based Science Class
Roa Pinzón, M. A. (2011). Making connections: Impact of Graphic Organizers in Reading
Comprehension and Summarization.
Servati, K. (2012). Prewriting Strategies and their Effect on Student Writing.
Skogen, M. (2013). Reading in CLIL and in Regular EFL Classes: to What Extent Do They
Differ in Reading Proficiency and Strategy Use?
Sousa, D. A. (2005). How the brain learns to read. California: Corwin press.
Tayib, A. (2013). The Effect of Using Graphic Organizers on Writing (A Case Study of
Preparatory College Students at Umm-Al-Qura University).
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.
van Kraayenoord, C. (2010). The Role of Metacognition in Reading Comprehension. In H.-P.
Trolldenier, W. Lenhard, & P. Marx (Eds.), Focal points of the research and development
of pedagogically-psychological perspectives (pp. 277–302). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe
Wallace, C. (1992). Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wallace, M. (2004). Study skills in English: a course in reading skills for academic purposes.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
Wills, S., & Ellis, E. (2005). The Theoretical and Empirical Basis for Graphic Organizer
Instruction, (1991), 1–21.
Wills, S., & Ellis, E. (2005). The Theoretical and Empirical Basis for Graphic Organizer
Instruction, (1991), 1–21.
You, Y. (2011). Factors in Vocabulary Acquisition through Reading. Itj, 8(1), 43–57.
264394
TE09075
Autor
Morales Pulido, Virginia
Institución
Resumen
El objetivo principal de este estudio de investigación fue determinar cómo la aplicación de los organizadores gráficos afecta el desarrollo de las habilidades de lectura de los estudiantes en el aprendizaje integrado de contenido y lengua extranjera. Esta investigación siguió un enfoque de investigación acción y se llevó a cabo en una institución educativa estatal con 36 estudiantes de READING COMPREHENSION IN CLIL ii noveno grado. De acuerdo con los datos recogidos en el análisis de necesidades hay una escasa comprensión de lectura, así como estrategias adecuadas para leer. La estrategia para abordar el problema fue el uso de organizadores gráficos y la integración de contenidos de otras asignaturas. Los instrumentos para la recolección de datos usados son: pruebas de lectura, cuestionarios y el diario de campo de la docente. Después de la implementación y el análisis de los datos se encontró que los organizadores gráficos promueven la comprensión de lectura, desarrollan estrategias de lectura, y mejoran el aprendizaje integrado de contenidos y lengua extranjera. Estas herramientas permiten a los estudiantes analizar los textos, seleccionar información importante y organizar el contenido desarrollando habilidades de pensamiento de orden inferior y superior para construir conocimiento. La organización de la información leída usando gráficos permite a los estudiantes retener el contenido del texto ya que los organizadores gráficos promueven el aprendizaje significativo, los organizadores son herramientas valiosas que permiten conectar la información previa y la nueva que el lector tiene de un texto. Aunque los textos contenían una cantidad considerable de vocabulario desconocido y los estudiantes nunca habían recibido instrucción en el aprendizaje de contenidos de otras asignaturas en inglés superaron estas dificultades usando los organizadores y los glosarios.