masterThesis
The effects of peer-correction and peer-assessment on students’ spoken fluency
Fecha
2016-06-16Registro en:
Arnold, J. (2000). Affect in Language Learning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and
Research Press.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning.
Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
Bartram, M. &Walton, R. (1991). Correction. Language Teaching Publications. pp. 87 – 91
Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in higher education,
15 (1), 101-111
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. (3rd ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall,
Inc
Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching. The Roles of fluency and
Accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Burns, A. (2009). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for
practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.
Burns, A., & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on speaking. Sydney: National Center for English
Language Teaching and Research.
Burns, D. (2007). Systemic Action Research. Policy Press
Canale, M. (1984). A communicative approach to language proficiency assessment in a minority
setting. In Rivera, C. (Ed.), Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment: Research and application, 107-122. Clevedon: Multilingual
Matters.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second
language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics,1, 1-47.
Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei,Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative Competence: A
Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content specification. University of California.
Chaney, A. (1998). Teaching Oral Communication. In: Grandes K-8. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Chastain, K. (1975). Affective And Ability Factors In Second-Language Acquisition. Language
Learning, 25(1), 153-161.
Chen, Q. (2009). The potential barriers to college English assessment policy change in China. A
Sociocultural Perspective. In B. Garrick, S. Poed, &. J, Skinner (Eds) , Educational
Planet Shapers: Researching hypothesizing, dreaming the future (pp 115-126). Brisbane:
Post Press.
Chen, Y., & Tsai, C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer
assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 105-117.
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing,
22(1), 93– 121
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1994). Motivation, Self-confidence, and Group
Cohesion in the Foreign Language Classroom. Language Learning, 44(3), 417-448
Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Cohen, A. D. (1996). Developing the Ability to Perform Speech Acts. Studies in Second
Language Acquisition Stud. Sec. Lang. Acq., 18(02), 253
Cohen L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. (6th ed.).
London: Routledge Falmer
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (Eds.). (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and
procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. London: Collier Books.
Duque, M. (2014). Young adult learners’ self-assessment of their own vocabulary: How does it
Influence their oral fluency? (Unpublished Master‘s thesis). Universidad de la Sabana.
Chía, Colombia.
Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment. Innovations in
Education & Training International, 32(2), 175-187
Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving Assessment through student involvement: Practical solution for
aiding learning in higher and further education. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Fairclough, N. (1995). General introduction. Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of
language. London and New York: Longman, pp. 1-20.
Fillmore, L. W. (1979). Individual differences in second language acquisition, in Fillmore, C,
Kempler, D and Wang, W Y S (Eds) Individual Differences in Language Ability and
Language Behavior, New York, NY: Academic Press.
Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment & Evaluation in
Higher Education, 20(3), 289-300
Friesner, T,. & Hart, M. (2005). Learning Logs: Assessment or Research Method? Business and
Management, University of Chichester, UK. Retrieved from:
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/ejbrm-volume3-issue2-article155.pdf
Garner, E. (1996). Seven barriers to communication. London: Manage Train Learn
Ganji, M. (2009). Teacher-correction, Peer-correction and Self- correction: Their Impacts on
Iranian Students‘ IELTS Essay Writing Performance. The journal of Asia TEFL Vol. 6,
No. 1, pp. 117-139,
Gielen, S., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., & Smeets, S. (2011). Goals of peer assessment
and their associated quality concepts. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 719-735.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine
Gomes, D. (2014). The impact of peer and self-assessment on teenage B2 students´ Use of
Present Perfect Simple, Present Perfect Continuous and Past Perfect Simple in their
Spontaneous Spoken Production (Unpublished Master‘s thesis). Universidad de la
Sabana, Chía, Colombia
Gower, D,. Phillips, S. Walters. (1995). Teaching Practice Handbook. London: Macmillan
Heinemann English Language Teaching.
Haastrup, K,. & Phillipson, R. (1984). Learner language and language learning. Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters 14
Harmer, J. (2004). How to Teach English. London: Longman.
House, J. (1996). Developing Pragmatic Fluency in English as a Foreign Language: Routines and
Metapragmatic Awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition Stud. Sec. Lang.
Acq., 18(02), 225
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford, Oxford University
Press
Hymes, D.H. (1972). ―On Communicative Competence‖ In: J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds)
Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-293. (Part 2)
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln
(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–605). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage
Koponen, M. & Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In H.
Riggenbach (Ed.). Perspectives on Fluency. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan
Press, 5–25.
Krashen, S., Terrell D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom.
Hayward, CA: Alemany Press
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon
Press.
Krashen, S. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Prentice Hall
International.
Langan, A. M., Shuker, D. M., Cullen, W. R., Penney, D., Preziosi, R. F., & Wheater, C. P.
(2008). Relationships between student characteristics and self‐, peer- and tutor
evaluations of oral presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2),
179-190.
Li, S. (2008). Exploration of a Conceptual Framework for Intercultural Communicative English
Language Teaching in China (Doctoral dissertation). Shanghai: Shanghai International
Studies University
Macaro, E. (1997). Target language, collaborative learning and autonomy. Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters.
Marshall, B., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mertler, C. A. (2001). Using performance assessment in your classroom. Unpublished
manuscript, Bowling Green State University
Morgan, B. D. (1998). The ESL classroom: Teaching, critical practice, and community
development. University of Toronto Press.
Ni, H. (2012). The Effects of Affective Factors in SLA and Pedagogical Implications. TPLS
Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7)
Nilson, L,. (2003) Improving student peer feedback. College Teaching, 51(1), 34-38
Nunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: A
comprehensive guide. Heinle Cengage Learning
Nunan, D. (1989). The teacher as researcher' in C. Brumfit and R. Mitchell , Research in the
language classroom . London: Modern English Publications
Ochs, E. (1979). Acquisition of Discourse Competence. Oxford Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol
1, pp-358-361.
O‘Malley, J., & Valdez, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English teachers: Practical
approaches for teachers. London: Addison-Wesley.
Peng, J. (2010). Peer assessment in EFL context: Attitudes and correlation. Second Language
Research Forum, ed. Matthew T. Prior et al., 89-107. Somerville, MA. Indiana
University
Richert, A. E. (1990). Teaching teachers to reflect: A consideration of programme
structure. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(6), 509-527.
Ritchie J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice. London: Sage
Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics.
London: Longman
Roskams, T. (1999). Chinese Efl Students' Attitudes To Peer Feedback and Peer Assessment in
an Extended Pairwork Setting. RELC Journal, 30(1), 79-123
Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30.
Sambell, K,.& Mcdowel, L. (1997). The Value of Self and Peer Assessment to the Developing
Lifelong Learner. ISL Symposium.
Saumell, V. (2011). Guided Discovery for Language Instruction: A Framework for
Implementation at all Levels. English in Common. Pearson.
Snow, M. A. (1998). Trends and Issues in Content-Based instruction. Ann Rev Appl Ling Annual
Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 243-267.
Spies, K. L. (2012). The Role of Peer feedback in Oral Communicative Tasks for Young Adult
Learners (Unpublished Master‘s thesis). Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Stenhouse, L. (1975.) An introduction to curriculum research and development. London,
Heinemann
Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading
time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures
and Techniques. (3rd ed.).Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Sultana, A. (2009). Peer correction in ESL classrooms. BRAC University Journal, 6(1), 11-19.
Tseng, S. (2012). The Factors Cause Language Anxiety for ESL/EFL Learners in Learning
Speaking. WHAMPOA - An Interdisciplinary Journal, 63(2012), 75-90
Tuttle, H. G. (2011). Peer formative assessment improves student fluency. In R. Goldberg & W.
White (Eds.), People, practices, and programs that inspire. Buffalo, NY: NYSAFLT.
Ur, P. (1991). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Verloop, N., & Wubbels, T. (2000). Some major developments in teacher education in the
Netherlands and their relationship with international trends. In G. M. Willems, J. H. J.
Stakenborg, & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Trends in Teacher Education (pp. 19-32). Leuven
Apeldoorn: Garant.
Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment
activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering
Education, 35(4), 429-443.
Williams, E. (1992). Student Attitudes Towards Approaches To Learning And
Assessment.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 17(1), 45-58
Witbeck, M. C. (1976). Peer Correction Procedures for Intermediate and Advanced ESL
Composition Lessons. TESOL Quarterly, 10(3), 321
Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action Research Living Theory. London: Sage.
Yang, Y. I. (2014). The development of speaking fluency: The 4/3/2 technique for the EFL
learners in China. IJRSLL International Journal of Research Studies in Language
Learning, 3(4). DOI: 10.5861/ijrsll.2013.624
Yule, G. (2010). The study of language, 4th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
262143
TE08315
Autor
Escobar Almeciga, Wilder Yesid
Institución
Resumen
Este documento examina el efecto de las estrategias de co-evaluación y corrección por pares en el desarrollo de fluidez oral. Este estudio se llevó a cabo con 22 participantes de nivel A2 en la habilidad de lenguaje quienes experimentaron dificultades con su fluidez al momento de entablar conversaciones orales con interlocutores y quienes deseaban demostrar el mismo nivel de fluidez tanto en lenguaje hablado como escrito para el desarrollo profesional y por razones de crecimiento personal. Este manuscrito sigue en el método cualitativo para analizar la efectividad de la intervención que apuntaba mejorar la fluidez oral de los estudiantes. El estudio fue diseñado para determinar el impacto que estas dos estrategias de auto monitoreo o control tenían sobre la fluidez oral de los participantes desarrollando competencia comunicativa a través de la mitigación de filtros afectivos que privaban a los estudiantes el desarrollo oral de la lengua. Este proceso permitió que la mayoría de los participantes identificaran sus propios errores proporcionando retroalimentación entre compañeros, creando confianza y una percepción positiva ante la implementación reflexionando sobre el valor de las estrategias en contextos donde se enseña inglés como lengua extranjera