Improving second language acquisition through the implementation of FONTAN system

masterThesis

Fecha

2015-11-07

Registro en:

Aliponga, J., Gamble, C., Ando, S. (2011). Verbalization Plus Automatization Plus Autonomy: A simple formula for learner autonomy. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 5-16). Gaziantep: Zirve University. Retrieved from http://ilac2010.zirve.edu.tr

Baptista, Fernandez and Hernandez. (2010). Metodología de la investigación, Mc Graw-Hill / interamericana editores, s.a. de C.V.

Bayat, O. (2011). The Effects of Out-of-Class Use of English on Autonomy Perception. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 105-115). Gaziantep: Zirve University. Retrieved from http://ilac2010.zirve.edu.tr

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Brockett, Ralph. Is it Time to Move On? Reflections on a Research Agenda for Self-Directed Learning in the 21st Century. University of Tennessee – Knoxville, USA

Brockett, R. G. and Hiemstra, R. (1991). 'A conceptual framework for understanding self-direction in adult learning' in Self-Direction in Adult Learning: Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice, London and New York:Routledge. Retrieved August 11 2012. http://www.infed.org/archives/e-texts/hiemstra_self_direction.htm

Brookfield, Stephen. Adult Education Quarterly, Volume 43, No. 4, 1993. Retrieved April 06, 2015. Self-Directed Learning, Political Clarity and the Critical Practice of Adult Education.

Caffarella, R.S., & O’Donnell, J. M. (1987). Self-directed learning: A critical paradigm revisited. Adult Education Quarterly, 37, 199-211. Technology and Distance Learning. (n.d.). http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/tdlearn.html.Dislen, G. (2011).

Exploration of how students perceive autonomous learning in an EFL context. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 126-136). Gaziantep: Zirve University. Retrieved from http://ilac2010.zirve.edu.tr

Fontan, J. (2005). Sistema Educativo Relacional Fontán-Material de inducción para implantación de pilotos en educación pública.Chia Cundinamarca.

Grietens, H. (1999). Attitudes towards social limits, undersocialized behavior, and self-presentation in young people: A contribution to the theoretical framework and the empirical validation of the reaction pattern research in Flanders. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readinessscale. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 6467A. Retrieved April 06, 2015.

Hanover research, Best Practices in personalized Learning Environments (Grades 4-9). 2012. Retrieved June 26, 2015 from http://www.hanoverresearch.com/media/Best- Practices-in-Personalized- Learning-Environments.pdf

Hetero-. (n.d.). Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. Retrieved August 31, 2015, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hetero

ICFES Instituto Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación, 2014 http://www.icfesinteractivo.gov.co/Clasificacion/ http://pagines.uab.cat/melindadooly/sites/pagines.uab.cat.melindadooly/files/Chpt1.pdf http://iteslj.org/Articles/Thanasoulas-Autonomy.html

ILO. 2008. International Standard Classification of Occupations International Journal of Self-Directed Learning® (2004). Volume 1, Spring 2004. Online: http://www.oltraining.com/SDLwebsite/IJSDL/IJSDL1.1-2004.pdf

Retrieved April 06, 2015. James H. McMillan-Sally Schumacher, Investigación educativa 5.a edición. PEARSON EDUCACIÓN, S. A., Madrid, 2005

Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second Language teacher education. A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.

Kasworm, Carol. Trends in adult higher education: New possibilities for preparing the information work force. Retrieved April o4, 2015, from http://ncsu.academia.edu/CKasworm/Papers/170000/Trends

Krashen, S. D. (1987) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Prentice-Hall International

Little, D. (2000a). Learner autonomy and human interdependence: some theoretical and practical consequences of a social-interactive view of cognition, learning and language. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb (Eds), Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions, 15-23. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education. https://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/1409

Mager, R.F. (1984). Preparing instructional objectives. (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA.

Mahdavinia, M. & Nabatchi, L. (2011). Portfolio Assessment: A tool for self-directed learning at post-secondary Level. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 76-90). Gaziantep: Zirve University. Retrieved from http://ilac2010.zirve.edu.tr Personalized Learning, a commentary by the teaching andlearning research programme. 2004. Retrieved June 28, 2915 from http://www.tlrp.org/documents/personalised_learning.pdf

Ministerio de Educación Nacional, (2014) .Programa Nacional de Inglés 2015 - 2025 Documento de Socialización. Retrieved June 28, 2015 From http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/micrositios/1752/articles- 343287_recurso_1.pdf

Murphy, L. (2011).Autonomy and context: a tale of two learners. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 17-26). Gaziantep: Zirve University. Retrieved from http://ilac2010.zirve.edu.tr Personalized Learning, a commentary by the teaching and learning research programme. 2004. Retrieved June 28, 2915 from http://www.tlrp.org/documents/personalised_learning.pdf

Murray, G. (2011). Metacognition and imagination in self-access language learning. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 5-16). Gaziantep: Zirve University. Retrieved from http://ilac2010.zirve.edu.tr

Stronge, J. (2002), Qualities of Effective Teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Nunan’s (1997: 195) model ‘Autonomy: levels of implementation. Retrieved August 04, 2015 from http://www2.elc.polyu.edu.hk/cill/HASALD/r&sAuton.htm#Awareness

Twani, E., Fontan, J. (2012). Fontan Relational Education, Learning One to One Foundation, Microsoft Partners in Learning Innovative Schools Case Study Fontán School.

Wiley, (n.d.) retrieved from http://www.wiley.com/legacy/wileychi/barker/supp/excerpt.pdf

Zolt´n Dörnyei (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31, pp 117135 doi: 10.1017/S026144480001315X

http://hdl.handle.net/10818/19921

176107

TE07858

http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3476906

Autor

Ternent de Samper, Ana María

Bryan Zambrano, Nohora Edith

Institución

Universidad de la Sabana (Colombia)

Resumen

Este proyecto de investigación se llevó a cabo con los estudiantes, padres y docentes de un colegio público en Chía, Colombia. El estudio se centró en determinar los resultados de la implementación de una alternativa pedagogía llamada sistema relacional FONTAN en los procesos de aprendizaje de los estudiantes de un segundo idioma. Este estudio también se centró en apoyar los factores académicos y capacidades individuales que han influido en los resultados de los estudiantes en el nivel actual de inglés en el colegio. Cuestionarios, encuestas y entrevistas fueron utilizados para recopilar datos. Los datos fueron analizados cualitativamente y los resultados mostraron que los estudiantes pueden llegar a expresarse con fluidez y seguridad, pueden tener avances significativos en corto tiempo desarrollando autonomía y relacionar lo que aprenden con sus experiencias, mientras se esfuerzan por alcanzar la excelencia a su propio ritmo. Por otro lado, los resultados mostraron que la autonomía y su desarrollo se deben aplicar en las diferentes asignaturas. La implementación de un diagnóstico inicial de necesidades acerca de la enseñanza del inglés, se podría hacer a través de la creación de comunidades de aprendizaje y el acceso a recursos tecnológicos.

Materias

Inglés básico -- Colombia

Materiales de enseñanza -- Colombia

Inglés -- Semántica

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem