Planning and problem-solving strategies to improve oracy in young adult learners

masterThesis

Fecha

2014-05-22

Registro en:

Alexander, R. (2012). Imroving oracy and classroom talk in English schools: Achievements and challenges. DFE Seminar on Oracy. Cambridge: The National curriculum and educational standards.

Arismendi, F. A., Colorado, D., & Grajales, L. F. (2011). Reading comprehension in face-to-face and web based modalities: graduate students' use of reading and language learning strategies in EFL. Colombian applied linguistics journal, 11-28.

Ariza, A. (2008). Unveling students' understanding of autonomy: puzzling out a path to learning beyond the EFL classroom. Retrieved from Profile Journal Issues in teachers' professional development: http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/10591

Barr, R., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P., & Pearson, D. (1996). Handbook of reading research: Volume II. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Inc.

Bigelow, M., & Tarone, E. (2004, Winter). The Role of Literacy Level in second language acquisition: Doesn't who we study determine what we know? . Retrieved from Tesol Quarterly: http://203.72.145.166/TESOL/TQD_2008/VOL_38_4.pdf#page=123

Bransford, A., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn:Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington D:C.: National Academy Press.

Brooks, G., Giles, K., Harman, J., Kendall, S., Rees, F., & Whittaker, S. (2001, January). Assembling the fragments: A review of research on adult basic skills. Retrieved from www.webarchieve.nationalarchieves.go.uk: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/https://www.education.gov.u k/publications/eOrderingDownload/RB220.pdf

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univerity Press.

Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: a guide to practitioners. Ney York: Routledge.

Campbell, K. K., & Schultz, S. (2009). The rhetorical act: Thinking, speaking and writing critically. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning

Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategies research and teaching. Retrieved from Centre for Language Studies National University of Singapore: http://eflt.nus.edu.sg/v1n122004/chamot.htmChamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company

Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company

Chamot, A. U., Barnhadt, S., El-Dinary, P. B., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Feria, I., Cabrales, M., & Cáceres, J. A. (2010, Septiembre-diciembre). Autonomy in English learning and its relationship with independent works assigned to students. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0123- 34322010000300004&script=sci_arttext

Ferrance, E. (2000). Action research. Providence: LAB at Brown university.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, F. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New Jersey: Rutgers.

Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A close look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. Tesol Quarterly, Vol 29, Pp 261-297.

Hannan, A. (2007). Questionnaires in education research. Retrieved from www.edu.plymouth.ac.uk: http://www.edu.plymouth.ac.uk/resined/QUESTS/index.htm

Haworth, A. (2001). The re-positioning of Oracy: a millennium project? Cambridge journal of education, 11-23.

Holderness, J., & Lalljee, B. (1998). Introduction to oracy: Frameworks for talk. London: Casell Education.

Kettle, M. A., & May, L. A. (2012). The ascendancy of oracy in university courses: Implications for teachers and second language users. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/48429/

Khonamri, F., & Kojidi, E. M. (2011). Metacognitive awareness and comprehension monitoring in reading ability of Iranian learners. Profile, 99-111.

Knowles, M. (2001). Andragogía: El aprendizaje de los adultos. Mexico: Oxford University Press.

Labarca, A., & Khanji, R. (2008, November 07). On Communication Strategies: Focus on Interaction. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005842

LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family 67, 837-857.

Littlewood, W. (2004, October 4). The task-based approach: some questions and suggestions. Retrieved from http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk: http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~vanton/Highlighted-Task%20based%20approachlittlewood.pdf

López, G. S., & Arciniegas, E. (2011). La lectura y la escritura de como herraminetas de aprendizaje en la formación universitaria, desde una perspectiva metacogntiva. Universidad del Valle.

McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 462-476.

Mineducación Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2005, October-December). Altablero. Retrieved from Mineducacion.gov.co: http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/article- 97495.html

Munn, P., & Drever, E. (1990). Using questionnaires in small-scale research. Retrieved from www.eric.ed.gov: http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED326488.pdf

Oficina Asesora de Comunicaciones. (15 de 03 de 2012). http://www.icfes.gov.co/. Obtenido de Mineducación e Icfes entregan resultados de las pruebas SABER PRO: http://www.icfes.gov.co/2012-07-05-14-55-31/doc_view/5739-boletin-mineducacion-eicfes-entregan-resultados-de-las-pruebas-saber-pro

Oxford, R. (1989, 12 0). The role of style and strategies in second language learning. Retrieved 9 2, 2012, from Eric Digest: http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-9214/styles.htm

Oxford, R. (1996). Metacognitive language learning strategies around the world: cross-cultural perspectives. Honolulu: Second language teaching and curriculum center University of Hawai'i.

Paredes, E. (2010, 6 22). Languag e learning strayegy used by Colombian adult English language learners: A phenomenological study. Retrieved from FIU Digital Commons: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/225

Pifarre, M., & Cobos, R. (2010). Promoting metacognitive skills through peer scaffolding in a CSCL environment. Computer-Supported collaborative learning, 237-253.

Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995, Summer). Cooperative versus comparative efforts and problem solving. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1170710?uid=3737808&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21102 340624987

Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigma of instructional theory. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Smith, R. (2008). Learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 395-397.

Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990a). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbery Park: Sage.

Talk to the World. (2012, 03 12). Programa Talk to the World. Bogota, D.C:, Colombia.

Vallejo, M., & Marínez, J. D. (2011, May-August). Communicative task and competence: Reflections on a focus group. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0123-34322011000200007&script=sci_arttext

Viafara, J. J., & Ariza, J. A. (2008, October). Un modelo tutorial entre compañeros como apoyo al aprendizaje autónomo. Retrieved from http://redalyc.uaemex.mx: http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/redalyc/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=255020449009

Viafara, J. J., & Ariza, J. A. (2008, October). Un modelo tutorial entre compañeros como apoyo al aprendizaje autónomo. Retrieved from Ikala, Revista de lenguaje y cultura: http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/redalyc/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=255020449009

Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wennergren, A.-C., & RÖnnerman, K. (2006, December 4). The relation between tools used in action research and the zone of proximal development. Retrieved from www.ipd.gu.se: http://gu.se/digitalAssets/1171/1171917_Educational_Action_Research.pdf

Wilkinson, A. (1970, January). The concept of oracy. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org: http://www.jstor.org/stable/811736

http://hdl.handle.net/10818/10749

256200

TE06122

http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3474734

Autor

Espitia Cruz, Martha Isabel

Institución

Universidad de la Sabana (Colombia)

Resumen

Este estudio describe el trabajo de investigación desarrollado con un grupo de estudiantes de nivel A1 (MCRE) de lengua extranjera en una universidad privada en Bogotá. El estudio es relevante en un momento en el cual las habilidades comunicativas en inglés de los estudiantes no han sido suficientemente desarrolladas para desempeñarse satisfactoriamente en el campo profesional. Basados en el análisis de necesidades se hizo relevante la implementación de estrategias de planeación y solución de problemas sugeridadas para fomentar la concientización de sus efectos en las habilidades orales de los estudiantes. Las fuentes de información para el estudio incluyeron bitácoras de estudiantes y profesor, protocolos de pensamiento en voz alta y un cuestionario final en el que los estudiantes reflejaron sus reflexiones en el uso de las estrategias y su efecto en sus habilidades orales. Los resultados encontrados resaltaron que la implementación de las dos estrategias ayudó a mejora habilidades orales tales como fluidez, coherencia y reconocimiento de la audiencia; así mismo los estudiantes fueron conscientes de la importancia del uso de esas estrategias para el proceso de aprendizaje del inglés como lengua extranjera.

Materias

Inglés básico -- Enseñanza -- Colombia

Inglés -- Semántica

Inglés comercial -- Enseñanza

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem