The use of feedback on accuracy as a strategy to enhance students’ descriptive writing skills

dc.contributorSylvester Mcdougald, Jermaine
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-13T19:24:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T14:07:10Z
dc.date.available2013-12-13T19:24:45Z
dc.date.available2022-09-23T14:07:10Z
dc.date.created2013-12-13T19:24:45Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-13
dc.identifierAnderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D., & Archer, W. (2001, September). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5, 1- 17.
dc.identifierAsiri, I. (1996). University EFL Teachers’ Written Feedback on Compositions and Students’ Reactions. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Essex.
dc.identifierBartram, M. and Walton, R. Correction. 1991. Language Teaching Publications.
dc.identifierBatstone, R. (1996). Key Concepts in ELT: Noticing. ELT Journal 50 (3) 273-273.
dc.identifierBautista, G.; Borges, F.; Forés, A. (2006). Didáctica universitaria en entornos virtuales de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Madrid: Narcea
dc.identifierBiggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
dc.identifierBouma, G. (2000). The research Process (Vol. 4th Edition). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifierBrown, J.D. (1994). Research methods for Applied Linguistics: Scope, characteristics, and standards. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (476- 500). Oxford: Blackwell
dc.identifierBrown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Longman
dc.identifierByrne, D. (1988). Teaching Writing Skills. Longman Group UK Ltd.
dc.identifierBurns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifierCohen, A. D., and M. Robbins, (1976). Toward assessing inter language performance: The relationship between selected errors, learners' characteristics, and learners' explanations. innpage Learning 26: 45-66.
dc.identifierCouncil of Europe, (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifierCousin, G. (2009). Researching Learning in Higher Education: An Introduction to Contemporary Methods and Approaches. New York. Library of congress Cataloging –in- Publication Data.
dc.identifierCreswell, J. W. (2004). Educational Research: Planning, conducting and Evaluating Quantitive and Qualitative Research. (2. Edition, Ed.) Upper Sadle River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice HAll.
dc.identifierDerewianka, B. (1992). Exploring how text works. Newton, NSW: PrimarilyEnglish Teaching Association.
dc.identifierDe vos, A.S.; Strydom, H.; Fouché, C.B. and Delport, C.S.L. (2002). Research at grass roots: For the social sciences and human service professions. 2nd ed.. Pretoria: VanSchaik Publishers.
dc.identifierDickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in Language Learning. Cambridge: CUP.
dc.identifierElliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
dc.identifierEl-Tatawy, M. (2002). Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics. Teacher’s College, Columbia University. As retrieved on May 27th 2012. From http://www.tc.columbia.edu/academic/tesol/webjournal/elTatawy.pdf
dc.identifierFazey, D., & Fazey, J. (2001). The potential for autonomy in learning. Studies in Higher Education, 26 (3), 345
dc.identifierFerris, D., and B. Robert, (2001). Error feedback in L2writing classes: How explicity does it need to be? Journal of second Innpiage writing 10: 161-184.
dc.identifierFerris, D. R. (2002).Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifierFlower, L. (1979). Writer-based Prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41(1), 19-37.
dc.identifierFreeman, D. (1998). Doing Teacher- Research: From Inquiry to Understanding. Canada. Heinle & Heinle Publishers
dc.identifierFreedman, S. (1987). Response to Student Writing. Urbana Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.
dc.identifierFrodesen, J. (2001). Grammar in writing. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.).pp.233-248. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
dc.identifierFulgor. (2006, december). Foreign Language students’ perceptions of a reflective approach to text correction. Flinders University:3(1), 25-34. Retrieved May 25, 2012, from http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/deptlang/fulgor/volume3i1/papers/Miceli_v3i1.pdf
dc.identifierGardner, D. (1999). Self-assessment for autonomous language learners. Retrieved November, 13, 2011, from http://ddd.uab.cat/pub/lal/11337397n7p49.pdf
dc.identifierGardner, A., & Johnson, D. (1997). Teaching personal experience narrative in the elementary and beyond. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona Writing Project Press
dc.identifierGrabe, W. & Robbert B. K. (1996). Theory and practice of Writing. UnitedStates of America. Addison Wesley Longman
dc.identifierGraddol, D. (1997). The Future of English? A guide to forecasting the popularity of the English language in the 21st century. London: The British Council.
dc.identifierHadley, O. A. (1993). Teaching language in context. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
dc.identifierHarmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Longman.
dc.identifierHarmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. England: Pearson Education Ltd.
dc.identifierHarmer, J. (2007). How to teach writing. In: . How to teach English. Harlow: Longman, 1998. cap. 8, 79-86.
dc.identifierHarmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Education Limited.
dc.identifierHedge. T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford. University Press.
dc.identifierHolec, H.(1981) Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon. (First published 1979, Strasbourg: Council of Europe)
dc.identifierHopkins, D. (1993). A teacher’s guide to classroom research. Buckingham: Open University Press. BIBLIOGRAPHY \l 9226
dc.identifierHyland, K. (2009). Teaching and Researching Writing. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
dc.identifierIvor T. and Carlos, I. (2003). Lexical approach 1 - What does the lexical approach look like. http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/articles/lexical-approach-1-what-does-lexicalapproach-look Accessed 05/09/20012.
dc.identifierKeh, C. (1990). Feedback in the Writing Process: a Model and Methods for Implementation. English Language Teaching Journal, 44 (4), 294-304.
dc.identifierKepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development to the development of mcmd-language writing skills. Modern language Journal 75: 305-313.
dc.identifierLalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66 (1), 140-149
dc.identifierLee, I. (1997).ESL learners' performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for college-level teaching System 25: 465477.
dc.identifierLee, I. (2004).Enhancing the Effectiveness of Teacher Feedback in the Secondary Writing Classroom. Chinese University of Hong Kong. Retrieved on May 20th 2012. http://sba.edu.hku.hk/new_sba/doc/conference_ppt/Dr%20Icy%20Lee.ppt
dc.identifierLeeman, J. (2007). Feedback in L2 learning: Responding to errors during practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (111–37).
dc.identifierLightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in Communicative Language Teaching: Effects on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.
dc.identifierLittle, D. (2004). “Learner autonomy and second/foreign language learning”. Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies Good Practice Guide. Retrieved May 20th2012, from http://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/1409
dc.identifierMaarek, S. (2009). The Effectiveness of Correction Symbols as Feedback in Enhancing SelfCorrection in Writing The Case of First-Year Students, University of Constantine. Mentouri. University-Constantine. Retrieved from: http://bu.umc.edu.dz/theses/anglais/MAA1083.pdf
dc.identifierMariani, L. (1997). Teacher Support and Teacher Challenge in promoting Learner Autonomy. Perspective, TESOL. XXIII (2).
dc.identifierMedina, B. (2003). The Role of Text Linguístics in the Foreign LanguageClass. Universidad Antonio de Nebrija. Madrid. Retrieved on December 16th, 2011. http://dspace.uah.es/dspace/bitstream/10017/990/1/The+Role+of+Text+Linguistics+in+th e+Foreign+Language+Class.pdf
dc.identifierMinisterio de Educación Nacional República de Colombia, 22. (2006). Formar en Lenguas Extranjeras: El Reto lo que Necesitamos Saber y Saber Hacer. Imprenta Nacional.
dc.identifierMyles, J. (2002, para. 2. September). Second Language Writing and Research: The writing Process and Error Analysis in Students Texts[Abstract].TESL-EJ:6(2). Retrieved May 20, 2012, from http://www.cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp/information/tesl-ej/ej22/a1.html
dc.identifierNagy & Leavy (2008) Handbook of the research Method. New York. Guildford press.
dc.identifierNunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language teaching. New York: CUP.
dc.identifierNunan, D.(1993). “Action research in language education”. In Teachers develop teachers research, J. Edge and K. Richards (eds), 39-50. Oxford: Heinemann.
dc.identifierNunan, D. (1996). The Self-Directed Teacher: Managing the Learning Process. New York, USA: CUP
dc.identifierNunan, D. (1999). Language Teaching Methodology: A text Book for Teachers (p. 88). London: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltda. p. 88.
dc.identifierNunan, D., & Lamb, C. (1996). The Self-directed Teacher: Managing the Learning Process. New York, USA: CUP.
dc.identifierOshima, A. & Hogue, A. (1999). Writing Academic English 3rd Edition. (p.3). New York: Addison Wesley Longman
dc.identifierPienemann, Manfred (1998). Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ISBN 9781556195495.
dc.identifierPolit D.F. and Hungler B.P. (1999) Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 6th ed. Philadelphia. Lippincott.
dc.identifierRaimes, A. (1983). Techniques in Teaching Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifierReid, J. (1993). Teaching ESL Writing. .New Jersey: Prentice Hall. p. 217.
dc.identifierRobb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586390
dc.identifierSagor, R. (2011). The Action Research Guidebook: A Four-Stage Process for Educators and School Teams. Corwin. United States of America.
dc.identifierSalomon, G. (1996). Technology rich study environments: A suggested conceptual framework. In: Mevarekh, Z. & Chativa, N. (Eds.), The computer-in-the-school, pp. 17-38. Jerusalem & Tel Aviv: Schocken Publications. (Hebrew)
dc.identifierSchmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11, 129-158.
dc.identifierSeng, R. (2010).Using Indirect Feedback in Corecting student writing. STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat.
dc.identifierSchellekens, P. (2007). The Oxford ESOL Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifierSherry, L. (1995). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Distance Education, 1, 337-365.
dc.identifierSommers, N. (1982). Responding to Student Writing. College Composition and Communication. Vol. 33, 148-156.
dc.identifierStrauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded Theory methodology: An overview, In: Handbook of Qualitative Research. London. Sage Publications
dc.identifierWenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifierWillis, J. (2008).Qualitative Research Methods in Education and Educational Technology. United States of America. Copyright Information Age Publishing Inc
dc.identifierZamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79-101.
dc.identifierZiv, N. (1984). The Effect of Teacher Comments on the Writing of Four College Freshmen. In Beach, R. and Bridwell, L. (Eds.) (1984). New Directions in Composition Research. Guilford Press
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10818/9286
dc.identifier256520
dc.identifierTE06236
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3473679
dc.description.abstractEl propósito de este estudio era determinar los efectos de la utilización de símbolos de corrección en gramática como una estrategia para ayudar a los alumnos a mejorar la habilidad de la escritura en textos descriptivos. La investigadora quiso responderla pregunta si el uso de códigos de corrección como una forma de realimentación indirecta del profesor sería eficaz o no para ayudar a los alumnos a mejorar la gramática.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.publisherMaestría en Didáctica del Inglés con Énfasis en Ambientes de Aprendizaje Autónomo
dc.publisherDepartamento de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceUniversidad de La Sabana
dc.sourceIntellectum Repositorio Universidad de La Sabana
dc.subjectGramática -- Educación
dc.subjectEscritura -- Enseñanza básica
dc.titleThe use of feedback on accuracy as a strategy to enhance students’ descriptive writing skills
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución