masterThesis

Factores asociados a la innovación medida por el número de patentes en una muestra de empresas industriales colombianas

Fecha
2014
Registro en:
Acosta, M. E., Camargo., H., Ríos R.,W., Venegas G.,C.; (2004) Corporación de Empresa de Base Tecnológica de Antioquia y la Corporación Andina de Fomento – CAF- con Parra, Rodríguez & Cavelier,. Protocolo de negociación de tecnología Programa Exporte. Bogotá. D.C. Colombia.
Acs, Z.J., Anselin,L., Vargas, A. (2002). Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge, Research Policy 31 (2002) 1069–1085. Published by Elsevier Science B.V
Acs, Z.J.., Audretsch, D.B., (1988). Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. The American Economic Review 78, 678–690.
Anselin, L. Vargas, A., Acs,Z. J., (2000) Geographical Spillovers and University Research: A Spatial Econometric Perspective. Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky Issue. Growth and Change. Volume 31, Issue 4, pages 501–515.
Ansoff, H.I. (1971), “Corporate Strategy”. London: Pelican Library of Business.
Archibugi, D., (1992). Patenting As an Indicator of Technological Innovation: A Review. Science and Public Policy. 19, 357–368.
Arundel, A., KablaI., (1998). What Percentage of Innovations Are Patented? Empirical Estimates For European Firms. Research Policy 27, 127–141.
Bania, N.; Calkins, L. N. and Dalenberg, D. R. (1992): «The Effects Of Regional Science and Technology Policy on The Geographic Distribution of Industrial R&D Laboratories», Journal of Regional Science, vol. 32-2.
BELL, M. y PAVITT, K. (1995): "The Development of Technological Capabilities", en I. Haque (ed.): International Competitiveness: Interaction of the Public and the Private Sectors, World Bank, Washington, pp. 69-101.
Bosch, M., Lederman, D. & Maloney, W. (2004) "Patenting and R&D: A Global View", Washington DC: World Bank, Mimeo.
Buesa, M., Heijs, J., Baumert, T. (2010). The Determinants Of Regional Innovation In Europe: A Combined Factorial And Regression Knowledge Production Function Approach, Research Policy 39 (2010) 722–735. Elsevier b.v. All rights reserved.
Buesa, M.; Baumert, T.; Heijs, J.; Martínez, M. (2002). Los Factores Determinantes de la Innovación: un Análisis Econométrico Sobre las Regiones Españolas. Instituto de Análisis Industrial y Financiero. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Science Direct.
Buitrago L.,E. (2003). “Derecho intelectual”, Librería Ediciones del Profesional Ltda. Segunda Edición, p. 132
Cabanellas, G., (2001): “Derecho de las Patentes de Invención”, Editorial Heliasta-Primera. Edición, República Argentina .p. 17
Cameron, A. y Trivedi, P., (2005), Microeconometrics. Methods and Applications. Cambridge. University Press.
Cameron, A. y Trivedi, p., (2009), Microeconometrics using stata. Stata Press.
Castañeda, A. C., Cubillos L. R., Sarmiento L. A. , Vallecilla G. J. (2008). “La Contribución Económica de las Industrias del Derecho de Autor y los Derechos Conexos En Colombia”. pag. 10
Coe, D.and Helpman, E. (1993) “International R&D Spillovers”, Working Paper 4444, Cambridge Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Cohen, W.. Eichard, C., Levin Mowery, D. (1987) "Firm Size and R&D Intensity: A Re-Examination." Cambridge. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 2205
Cohen,W. M., Nelson, R.R.,Walsh, J.P.,(2000). Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why Us Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not). Working Paper 7552.
Conte, A., Vivarelli, M. (2005). One or Many Knowledge Production Functions? Mapping Innovative Activity Using Microdata . Discussion Paper Series. Germany. IZA DP. N. 1878.
Crawford, R., Fabling, R., Grimes, A., Bonner, N. (2007). National R&D and Patenting: Is New Zealand an Outlier? New Zealand Economic Papers, 41 (1), P. 69-90 69. New Zealand Association of Economists
Daft, R.., (1978). A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation. Academy of Management Journal 21, 193–210.
Daft, R.., (1982). Bureaucratic Versus Non-Bureaucratic Structure and The Process of Innovation and Change. In: Bacharach, S.B., (ed.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 1. Ct: Jai Press, Greenwich, p. 129–166
Damanpour, F., (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal 5(34), p. 555–590
Damanpour, F., Evan, W.M.., (1990). The Adoption of Innovations Over Time: Structural Characteristics and Performance of Organizations. Proceedings of the National Decision Science Institute Conference, San Diego
Damanpour, F., Gopalakrishnan, S., (1998). Theories of Organizational Structure and Innovation Adoption: The Role of Environmental Change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 15, p. 1–24.
DANE, (2009). Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística, Metodología Encuesta de Desarrollo E Innovación Tecnológica, Estadística. Bogotá, D.C. Colombia.
DANE, (2010). Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Diseño Temático Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica –Industria. Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
DANE, (2011). Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística, Tercera Encuesta Nacional de Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Bogotá. D.C. Colombia.
DANE, (2012). Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Boletín de prensa 11 de Septiembre de 2012, Bogotá, D.C. p. 2
DANE, (20004). Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística Segunda Encuesta Nacional De Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Bogotá. D.C.
DANE, (2011-b). Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística), Boletín de prensa, 13 de mayo de 2011, Bogotá D.C. p. 2.
Dasgupta, P. & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a New Economics of Science. Research Policy, 23, 487- 521.
Dewar, R.., Dutton, J.E..,(1986). The Adoption of Radical And Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis. Management Science 32, 1422–1433.
Dodgson, M. y Rothwell, R. (1994): Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham.
Drucker, P.F. (2002) Managing In the Next Society.
Tttlie, J.E..,Briidges, W.P.., O’keefe, R.D..,(1984). Organization Strategy And Structural Differences For Radical Versus Incremental Innovation. Management Science 30, p. 682–695.
European Commission (2001). Recherche Et Développement: Statistiques Annuelles. Luxembourg.
Fay, D., Borrill, C., Amir, Z., Haward, R. & West, M. A. (2006). Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: A multi-sample study of team innovation in health care. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 553-567
Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wood, M. & Hawkins, C. (2005). The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 117-134
Foray, D. (2007). University – Industry Knowledge Transfer In Switzerland. En: Yusuf, s. Y Nabeshima, k (eds.), How Universities Promote Economic Growth. Washington: Banco Mundial.
Furman, J., Porter, M. and Stern, S. (2002) "The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity", Research Policy 31, p. 899-933.
Garnsey, E. (2007). The entreprenurial university. The idea and its critics. En: Yusuf, S. y Nabeshima, K. (Eds.), How Universities Promote Economic Growth. Washington: Banco Mundial.
Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues In Assesing The Contribution of R&D Productivity Growth, Bell Journal of Economics, Nº 10.
Griliches, Z. (1990) «Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey», Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 28. 1661–1707.
Guellec, D. and Evangelos, J. (1997) "Causes of Fluctuations in R&D Expenditures: A Quantitative Analysis." Paris, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, OECD Economic Studies No.29 1997.
Hargadon, A. B. & Douglas, J. Y. (2001). When Innovations meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476-501
Hughes, A. (2007). University-Industry Links and U.K. Science and Innovation Policy’. En Shahid Yusuf and Kaoru Nabeshima (Eds.), How Universities Promote Economic Growth. Washington: World Bank.
Kimberly, J. R., Evanisko, M., (1981). Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations. Academy Of Management Journal 24, p. 689–713
Kleinknecht, A., Van Montfort, K., Brouwer, E., (2002). The Non-Trivial Choice Between Innovation Indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11, p. 109–121.
Knight, K.E., (1967). A Descriptive Model of Intra-Firm Innovation Process. Journal of Management 41,4 p.4 78–496.
Langebaek R. A. y Vásquez E. D. (2007). “Determinantes de la actividad innovadora en la industria manufacturera colombiana”. Borradores de Economía. No. 433, p. 24
Lanjouw J. and Schankerman, M. (2004) “Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped”, Journal of Law and Economics, 47, p. 45-74
LALL, S. (1992): "Technological capabilities and industrialization", World Development Report Nº 20(2)
López A., 2008. Determinants of R&D Cooperation: Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms International Journal of Industrial Organization 26. 113–136
Lugones G., 2008. Módulo de capacitación para la recolección y el análisis de indicadores de innovación. Mexico. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Working Paper 8.
Mansfield, E., 1986. Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study. Management Science 32, 173–181.
Mazoyer, Pamela (1999) "Analysis of R&D Structure and Intensities." Wellington, Ministry of Research, Science & Technology, Research Paper.
Mejía, C. A. (2007). Innovation in Administration: A Relationship of Forgotten Elements. Innovar, 17(29), 93-106
Metke R,. (2002). Lecciones de Propiedad Industrial (ii). Editor Raisbeck, Lara, Rodríguez & Rueda (baker & Mckenzie). Bogotá, p. 22
Nelson P. and Winter, S. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Beilcnap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Nicoletti G, A Bassanini, E. Ernst, S Jean, P and P. Swaim (2001). “Product And Labour Markets Interactions In OECD Countries”, Paris: OECD Economics Department Working Paper Eco/Wkp, 38.
O'huallachain, B. (1999) "Patent Places: Size Matters", Journal of Regional Science 39(4), 613-636
OECD (1994). The Measurement of Scientific And Technological Activities Using Patent Data As Science and Technology Indicators. “Patent Manual”.Paris. OECD Publishing. p. 16, 26, 27, 29.
OCDE (2001). Cities and Regions in The New Learning Economy, Paris. OECD Publishing.
OCDE (2004). Compendium of Patent Statistics, Paris. OECD Publishing.
OCDE/CEPAL (2011), Perspectivas económicas de América Latina 2012: transformación del estado para el desarrollo, OECD Publishing.
OECD (2002) Propuesta de Norma Práctica para Encuestas de Investigación y Desarrollo Experimental de la OECD, “Manual Frascati”.
OECD, EUROESTAT, (2005). Guía Para la Recolección de Interpretación de Datos Sobre Innovación. Oslo. “Manual de Oslo”. p.23, 24, 37, 42, 43, 45
Okamuro, H, (2007). Determinants of Successful R&D Cooperation in Japanese Small Businesses: The Impact of Organizational And Contractual Characteristics Research Policy 36. p. 1529- 1544
Orozco, L., Chavarro, D., y Ruiz, C. (2010). Los Departamentos de I&D y la Innovación En la Industria Manufacturera de Colombia: Análisis Comparativo Desde el Comportamiento Organizacional. Innovar Vol. 20 No.37,1 p. 107
Pavitt, k.,(1983). R&D, Patenting and Innovative Activity: A Statistic Exploration. Research Policy 11, 33–51.
Pavitt, K., (1985). Patent Statistics as Indicators of Innovative Activities: Possibilities and Problems. Scientometrics 7 (1–2), 77–99.
Pavitt, K., (1988). In: Van Ra an (ed.), Uses and Abuses of Patent Statistics.
Pearce, C. L. & Ensley, M. D. (2004). A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: The central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 259-278
Porter, M. e. y Stern, S. 1999: Measuring The «Ideas» Production Function: Evidence From The International Patent Output, Nber Working Paper 7891
Porter,m.E.,( 1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York.
Ravichandran, T., (1999). Redefining organizational innovation: towards theoretical advancements. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 10(2), 243–274.
RICYT, O, CYTED, Colciencias y OCYT. (2001). Normalización De Indicadores de Innovación Tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe. “Manual de Bogotá”. Colombia. p.37, 38, 39.
Romer, P. (1990) «Endogenous Technological Change», Journal of Political Economy. Vol.98.
Romer, P. (1996) "Why, Indeed, In America? Theory, History, And the Origins of Modern Economic Growth." American Economic Review 86(2). p. 202-206
Rowley C. K. (1973). Políticas Antitrust y Eficiencia Económica. MacMillan Vicens-Vives
Schankerman, M. (1998) “Wow Valuable Is Patent Protection? Estimates by Technology Field”, Rand Journal of Economics, 29(1), p. 77-107
Scherer, F. M. y D. Ross. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd edition, Houghton Mifflin
Schmoch, U., (1999). In: Boch (ed.), Eignen Sich Patente Als Innovationsindikatoren?
Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New Cork: Harper and Brothers (Harper Colophon ed. 1976).
Siwek, Sthepen E. (2006). Copyright Industries In the U.S. Economy: The 2006 Report. United States of America. Pp. 2
SmithK., (2005). In: Fagerberg, Mowery, Nelson (eds.), Measuring Innovation.
Soete, L., (1978). Inventive Activity, Industrial Organization and International Trade. In: d.phil. Thesis. University of Sussex
Soete, L., Wayatt, S., (1983). The Use of Foreign Patenting as an International Comparable Science And Technology Output Indicator. Scientometrics 5, p. 31–54
Sun, Y., Du, D., (1983). “Determinants of industrial innovation in China: Evidence from its recent economic census”. Elsevier Ltd. China .Technovation 30 540–550.
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio. (2007). Manual del Inventor.
Tamayo, M., El Proceso de la Investigación, Limusa Noriega Editores, Cuarta Edición, 2004, p. 43-a 47.
Trajtenberg, m., 1990. Patents as Indicators of Innovation. Economic Analysis of Product Innovation. Cambridge, MA.
Tribunal de justicia de la Comunidad Andina. (2001). Proceso 43.
Turriago, A. (2011). Determinants of Innovation in a Set of a Colombian Industrial Firms, Working Paper, Área de Economía y Finanzas Internacionales, Universidad de La Sabana.
Uribe A.,M. (2002), “Propiedad industrial, Neoliberalismo y Derecho de la Vida”, Ed. Doctrina y Ley Ltda., p. 23
Utterback, J.M., (1971). The Process of Technological Innovation Within the Firm. Academy of Management Journal 14, 75–88.
Van de Ven, A.H., Angle, H.L.., Poole, M.S.. (eds.), (1989). Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, Harper & Row, New York.
Vera, D. & Crossan, M. (2005). Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams. Organization Science, 16(3), 203-224.
Wan, D., Chin huat O.., Lee, F. .(2005). Determinants of Firm Innovation in Singapore. Technovation 2, 261–268, Elsevier Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Watanabe, Ch.; Tsuji,. Youichirou,S.; Griffy-Brown, Ch.. (2001). Patent Statistics: Deciphering a ‘Real’ Versus a ‘Pseudo’ Proxy of Innovation. Technovation 21. 783–790. Elsevier Science.
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2011) “Principios Básicos de la Propiedad Industrial Organización”. Suiza. p. 3, 6-7
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2012-a) “Wipo Economics & Statistics Series: World Intellectual Property Indicators”. Switzerland.
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2012-b) “Reseña anual del PCT. El sistema internacional de patentes”.Suiza.
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2012). Base de Datos Estadísticos. Diciembre
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2012). Base de Datos Estadísticos. Noviembre
Wooldridge, J., (2010), Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
Zoltan J. Acsa, L.,Anselin, B, Attila, V., (2002). Patents And Innovation Counts As Measures Of Regional Production of New Knowledge. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
259146
TE06370
Autor
Turriago Hoyos, Álvaro
Institución
Resumen
Este trabajo tiene como propósito identificar los posibles factores asociados a la innovación —medida como el número de patentes de invención— tales como el tamaño de la empresa, porcentaje de empleados con nivel educativo profesional o mayor, el financiamiento por recursos propios de las empresas o de entidades gubernamentales, el ambiente regulador , las fuentes de ideas de innovación y la inversión en actividades de innovación—Investigación y Desarrollo (I&D), adquisición de maquinaria y equipo, transferencia de tecnología y capacitación— en empresas industriales colombianas de los sectores 155, 158, 232, 242 y 252 de la clasificación CIIU, tomando la información suministrada por las Segunda, Tercera y Cuarta Encuestas de Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico en Colombia (EDIT). Para la identificación y medición de posibles asociaciones se manejan bases de datos, estructuradas alrededor de las EDIT, las cuales facilitan montar páneles y diseño de regresiones que identifiquen posibles asociaciones.
Materias

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem