Artículo de revista
Deliberating over legislative ends An inventory of goal-(de)legitimizing argument schemes
Fecha
2020Registro en:
Journal of Argumentation in Context Volumen: 9 Número: 3 Páginas: 399-427 Dec 2020
10.1075/jaic.19010.ihn
Autor
Ihnen Jory, Constanza
Institución
Resumen
This paper outlines a non-exhaustive inventory of presumptive argument schemes that can be used by legislators to rationally argue for and against the legitimacy of legislative ends. The inventory has both a descriptive and normative dimension. The inventory is descriptive because it is partly based on the empirical observation of arguments actually used by legislators in a sample of lawmaking debates. However, the inventory is also normative because - as I shall argue in this paper - the schemes identified in the sample are presumptive arguments schemes. They are therefore schemes with a claim to rationality, provided that certain conditions are met. The schemes included in the inventory are: the scheme of instrumental argumentation, the scheme from unintended consequences, the scheme from values, the schemes from model and antimodel, and the schemes from social demand.
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.
-
A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
Budán, Paola D.; Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo -
Argument schemes of high school students when using GeoGebra in the context of tessellations
Morales Ramírez, Guadalupe; Larios Osorio, Víctor; Rubio Goycochea, Norma -
Argument schemes of high school students when using GeoGebra in the context of tessellations
Morales Ramírez, Guadalupe; Larios Osorio, Víctor; Rubio Goycochea, Norma