Dissertação
Terapia fotodinâmica com azul de metileno e etanol: perda óssea alveolar e resposta imune em ratos com periodontite
Fecha
2015-08-26Registro en:
CAMPAGNOLO, Cibele Bruno. PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WITH METHYLENE BLUE AND ETHANOL:
ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS AND IMMUNE RESPONSE IN RATS WITH
PERIODONTITIS. 2015. 89 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Odontologia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2015.
Autor
Campagnolo, Cibele Bruno
Institución
Resumen
The aim of this study was to evaluate a formulation of methylene blue (MB)
with ethanol to antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT), used as an adjunct to
mechanical treatment of experimental periodontitis induced in rats. Forty rats were
randomized into five groups: without periodontitis (CN); and periodontitis without
treatment (CP); periodontitis underwent three types of treatment: scaling and root
planing and irrigation with saline (RAR); scaling and root planing and aPDT with MB
diluted in water to 0.01% (aPDT/water); scaling and root planing and aPDT with MB
diluted in 20% ethanol (aPDT/ethanol). Periodontitis was induced by placing ligature
on the lower right first molar for seven days. Then, the ligatures were removed and
the treatments applied. The animals were euthanized seven days after the treatment.
The primary outcome was bone loss in the furcation region of the first molar
evaluated histometrically. The secondary outcome was the number of osteoclasts
immunohistochemically marked for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP).
Differences between groups were assessed by One Way ANOVA and post hoc
Bonferroni. Thirty-seven rats were subjected to analysis. All three treatment groups
showed statistically lower bone loss and smaller number of TRAP positive
osteoclasts compared to the untreated group (CP) (P <0.05). No difference was
observed for the outcomes between treatment groups (P> 0.05), and between
treatments and the negative control (P> 0.05). Bone loss and osteoclastic activity
were not changed by aPDT regardless of the inclusion of ethanol in methylene blue
formulation when compared to RAR. Therefore, the aPDT did not result in additional
benefit when used as adjunctive method to scaling and root planning, considering the
parameters evaluated in this study.