Otros
A review of the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate by four independent expert panels and comparison to the IARC assessment
Fecha
2016-09-30Registro en:
Critical Reviews in Toxicology, v. 46, p. 3-20.
1547-6898
1040-8444
10.1080/10408444.2016.1214677
2-s2.0-84989943015
2-s2.0-84989943015.pdf
Autor
New York Medical College
LLC
Aarhus University
University of London
Toxicology Consultant
Boston Children’s Hospital
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
University of Michigan
Technical University of Munich
Private Consultant
Kirkland Consulting
University of Pittsburgh
University of Guelph
University of Birmingham
Intertek Regulatory & Scientific Consultancy
University of New Mexico School of Medicine
Institución
Resumen
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published a monograph in 2015 concluding that glyphosate is “probably carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2A) based on limited evidence in humans and sufficient evidence in experimental animals. It was also concluded that there was strong evidence of genotoxicity and oxidative stress. Four Expert Panels have been convened for the purpose of conducting a detailed critique of the evidence in light of IARC’s assessment and to review all relevant information pertaining to glyphosate exposure, animal carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, and epidemiologic studies. Two of the Panels (animal bioassay and genetic toxicology) also provided a critique of the IARC position with respect to conclusions made in these areas. The incidences of neoplasms in the animal bioassays were found not to be associated with glyphosate exposure on the basis that they lacked statistical strength, were inconsistent across studies, lacked dose-response relationships, were not associated with preneoplasia, and/or were not plausible from a mechanistic perspective. The overall weight of evidence from the genetic toxicology data supports a conclusion that glyphosate (including GBFs and AMPA) does not pose a genotoxic hazard and therefore, should not be considered support for the classification of glyphosate as a genotoxic carcinogen. The assessment of the epidemiological data found that the data do not support a causal relationship between glyphosate exposure and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma while the data were judged to be too sparse to assess a potential relationship between glyphosate exposure and multiple myeloma. As a result, following the review of the totality of the evidence, the Panels concluded that the data do not support IARC’s conclusion that glyphosate is a “probable human carcinogen” and, consistent with previous regulatory assessments, further concluded that glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans.