A Comparative Analysis Between BPMN and ISO 19440 Modeling Language Constructs

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T19:15:47Z
dc.date.available2018-11-29T19:15:47Z
dc.date.created2018-11-29T19:15:47Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.identifierAdvances In Production Management Systems: Initiatives For A Sustainable World. Cham: Springer International Publishing Ag, v. 488, p. 256-263, 2016.
dc.identifier1868-4238
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/166203
dc.identifier10.1007/978-3-319-51133-7_31
dc.identifierWOS:000435577700031
dc.identifier1712686083614584
dc.identifier0000-0002-2326-141X
dc.description.abstractEnterprise modeling is a tool that can be used for simple objectives, such as understanding how a part of the enterprise works, to more complex objectives, such as information flow for the computerized systems, or knowledge storage in an organization. There are several languages proposed for enterprise modeling, such as BPMN, CIMOSA and UML. They have different characteristics, advantages and disadvantages. This paper presents a comparison in relation to representation capacity between the ISO 19440 language constructs and the BPMN notation based on their constructors and icons. The analysis shows that BPMN has less representation capacity, showing differences between one language for modeling various aspects in an enterprise (ISO 19440) and a notation (BPMN) which focuses on process modeling and has few constructs for representing other aspects such as an enterprise's resources and organization.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationAdvances In Production Management Systems: Initiatives For A Sustainable World
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectProcess modeling
dc.subjectEnterprise
dc.subjectModeling
dc.subjectBPMN
dc.subjectISO 19440
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis Between BPMN and ISO 19440 Modeling Language Constructs
dc.typeActas de congresos


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución