dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-06T16:13:38Z
dc.date.available2015-08-06T16:13:38Z
dc.date.created2015-08-06T16:13:38Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifierRSBO. Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia, v. 8, n. 4, p. 446-452, 2011.
dc.identifier1806-7727
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/125977
dc.identifier2665211298584751
dc.identifier3278495911207882
dc.identifier8956509178140113
dc.identifier0000-0001-5756-5828
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Both Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and Portland cement (PC) have been highlighted because of their favorable biological properties, with extensive applications in Endodontics, including the possibility of using into root canal filling. Objective: This article reviews literature related to MTA and PC comparing their physical, chemical and biological properties, as well as their indications. Literature review: Literature reports studies revealing the similarities between these materials’ properties, including both biocompatibility and bone repair induction. Moreover, there is the need for the development of a root canal sealer based on these materials (MTA and PC). Conclusion: MTA and CP show promissory perspective both in Dentistry and Endodontics.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationRSBO. Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes
dc.subjectEndodontics
dc.subjectMaterials testing
dc.subjectBiocompatible materials
dc.titleMTA versus Portland cement: review of literature
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución