Manoaje: a proposal to refound the “language” of “architectural thinking”

dc.creatorCárcamo Pino, Mauricio
dc.creatorWolff Cecchi, María Cecilia
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-21T15:33:04Z
dc.date.available2018-03-21T15:33:04Z
dc.date.created2018-03-21T15:33:04Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierEn: Proceedings of the International Conference ‘Between Data and Senses; Architecture, Neuroscience and the Digital Worlds. London: UEL, 2017. Cap. 11. p. 39-41
dc.identifier978-0-9935963-3-9 for E-Book
dc.identifier978-0-9935963-2-2 (for paperback)
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/146934
dc.description.abstractThis research explores the problem of the nonexistence and need of an operational and integral definition of “language” in the field of representation in architecture, despite the widespread and historic use and tacit validation of ‘drawing’ and ‘modelling’ as such, both in academic environments and in professional practice.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherUniversity of East London (UEL)
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceProceedings of the International Conference ‘Between Data and Senses; Architecture, Neuroscience and the Digital Worlds’
dc.subjectArchitectural thinking
dc.subjectLanguage
dc.subjectGrafoaje
dc.subjectManoaje
dc.subjectCognition
dc.subjectEnaction
dc.subjectSensorimotor Intelligence
dc.subjectArchitectural intelligence
dc.subjectThought
dc.subjectRepresentation
dc.subjectDrawing
dc.subjectModelling
dc.titleManoaje: a proposal to refound the “language” of “architectural thinking”
dc.typeCapítulo de libro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución