dc.contributorMuñoz Acevedo, Daniel
dc.contributorFacultad de Filosofía y Humanidades
dc.contributorEscuela de Postgrado
dc.contributorDepartamento de Lingüística
dc.contributorZenteno Bustamante, Carlos
dc.creatorZúñiga Pacheco, Margarita
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-16T18:43:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-25T22:51:38Z
dc.date.available2013-04-16T18:43:39Z
dc.date.available2019-04-25T22:51:38Z
dc.date.created2013-04-16T18:43:39Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/112769
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2417279
dc.description.abstractThe research presented here aimed at investigating into the lawyer-witness interaction in examination and cross-examination in courtroom, in terms of the speech acts that they perform in such a context which, as described above, can be unaffable for the witness. The antagonistic nature of courtroom examination, particularly of cross-examination, makes it interesting to determine the types of speech acts which are conveyed in the lawyer-witness interaction, beyond the evident fact that lawyers ask questions that the witness must answer.
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherUniversidad de Chile
dc.subjectActos de habla
dc.titleThe pragmatic function of speech acts as performed by lawyers and witnesses in anglo-american courtroom direct examination and cross examination and their relation to the objectives pursued by lawyers
dc.typeTesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución