dc.contributor | Muñoz Acevedo, Daniel | |
dc.contributor | Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades | |
dc.contributor | Escuela de Postgrado | |
dc.contributor | Departamento de Lingüística | |
dc.contributor | Zenteno Bustamante, Carlos | |
dc.creator | Zúñiga Pacheco, Margarita | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-04-16T18:43:39Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-25T22:51:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-04-16T18:43:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-25T22:51:38Z | |
dc.date.created | 2013-04-16T18:43:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier | http://www.repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/112769 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2417279 | |
dc.description.abstract | The research presented here aimed at investigating into the lawyer-witness interaction in examination and cross-examination in courtroom, in terms of the speech acts that they perform in such a context which, as described above, can be unaffable for the witness. The antagonistic nature of courtroom examination, particularly of cross-examination, makes it interesting to determine the types of speech acts which are conveyed in the lawyer-witness interaction, beyond the evident fact that lawyers ask questions that the witness must answer. | |
dc.language | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Chile | |
dc.subject | Actos de habla | |
dc.title | The pragmatic function of speech acts as performed by lawyers and witnesses in anglo-american courtroom direct examination and cross examination and their relation to the objectives pursued by lawyers | |
dc.type | Tesis | |