Calidad de vida, resultados y complicaciones en pacientes intervenidas de colpopexia con malla. Hospital Universitario Mayor 2015– 2018

dc.contributorGómez Polanía, Omar Leonardo
dc.contributorBuitrago-Medina, Daniel-Alejandro
dc.creatorMoncada Garzón, Jullieth Stephanny
dc.creatorMuñoz Escandón, Juan Camilo
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-29T16:02:36Z
dc.date.available2019-01-29T16:02:36Z
dc.date.created2019-01-29T16:02:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18953
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_18953
dc.description.abstractThe prolapse of the pelvic floor is an entity that occurs in at least 40% to 60% of women throughout their lives. Currently handling has evolved from the use of autologous tissue to prolapse repair to the application of prosthetic materials including stand polypropylene meshes whose use is supported by the Food and Drug Administration - FDA. Globally, there have been various studies in patients with pelvic floor prolapse in which there has been a use of mesh for the correction. The results of the evaluations indicate the occurrence of outcomes, including highlights recurrence disease, exposure of the mesh and vaginal infections, among others. In the current literature there is no data available in Colombia about this subject and there have been very few studies conducted in Latin America. The purpose of this project is to show the impact of surgery on quality of life in the patients who underwent vaginal mesh colpopexy surgery at the University Hospital Mayor - Mederi. Similarly, it is intended to assess urinary incontinence by using a survey.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEspecialización en Ginecología y Obstericia
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.rightsAtribución-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.sourceBaessler K, Christmann‐Schmid C, Maher C, Haya N, Crawford TJ, Brown J. Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(8).
dc.sourceHorst W, do Valle JB, Silva JC, Gascho CLL. Pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a Brazilian population. Int Urogynecol J. 2016
dc.sourceBarber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783–90
dc.sourceJelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD, Gynecology A. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet. 2007;369:1027–38.
dc.sourceHagen S, Thakar R. Conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2012;22(5):118–22.
dc.sourceRogo-Gupta L, Rodriguez L V, Litwin MS, Herzog TJ, Neugut AI, Lu Y-S, et al. Trends in surgical mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse from 2000 to 2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1105–15
dc.sourceGaines N, Gupta P, Sirls LT. Pelvic Prolapse Repair in the Era of Mesh. 2016;1–9
dc.sourceWise J. Permanent mesh has “ limited utility ” for vaginal prolapse repair , review finds. 2016;822(February):1–3.
dc.sourceRichter LA. P e l vic O rgan Pro l ap s e — Vag i n a l an d L a p a ro s c o p i c M e s h : The Evidence Pelvic organ prolapse Mesh Sacrocolpopexy Laparoscopy Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Clin NA [Internet]. 2016;43(1):83–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.004
dc.source- PA-LC, S, , AAD KHOURY - ALAN WEIN than I. Epstein DJG. Incontinence. EAU european assosiacion of urology. 2013. 1377-1442 p.
dc.sourceAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion no. 513: vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(6):1459–64.
dc.sourceFDA. Food and Drug Administration. FDA safety communication: Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh : Update on the Safety and Effectiveness of Transvaginal Placement for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Rev Lit Arts Am. 2011;(July):Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medical.
dc.sourceConstantini, E, Lazzeri M. What part does mesh play in urogenital prolapse management today ? PubMed Commons. Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25(4):300–4.
dc.sourceBacsu C, Zimmern P. Complicaciones del tratamiento de incontinencia urinaria y prolapso de la pelvis. Rev Médica Clínica Las Condes [Internet]. 2013;24(2):238–47. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S071686401370155X
dc.sourceSun Y, Tang C, Luo D, Yang L, Shen H. The treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapsed by repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(2):155–67.
dc.sourceMaldonado PA. P e l v i c O r g a n P ro l a p s e New Concepts in Pelvic Floor Anatomy Prolapse Anatomy Pelvic floor Compartments Concepts Theories. Obstet Gynecol Clin NA [Internet]. 2016;43(1):15–26. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.001
dc.sourceReid F. Pelvic organ prolapse : anatomical and functional assessment. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med [Internet]. 2017;27(2):57–64. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2017.01.004
dc.sourceRafael Luna Méndez T, Astudillo Dávalos FE. Uroginecología y cirugía reconstructiva de la pelvis: -.
dc.sourceDoaee M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Nourmohammadi A, Razavi-Ratk SK, Nojomi M. Management of pelvic organ prolapse and quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2014;25(2):153–63.
dc.sourceSun X, Zhang X, Wang J. Surgical outcomes and quality of life post-synthetic mesh-augmented repair for pelvic organ prolapse in the Chinese population. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(2):509–14.
dc.sourceRoovers3 CRK& MMEL& AT de K& JPWR. Effects of mesh-related complications in vaginal surgery on quality of life. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;
dc.sourceRuiz de Viñaspre Hernandez R, Tomás Aznar C, Rubio Aranda E. Validación de la versión española de las formas cortas del Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) y del Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) en mujeres embarazadas. Gac Sanit. 2011;25(5):379–84.
dc.sourceElaine Utomo, Ida J. Korfage, Mark F. Wildhagen, Anneke B. Steensma, Chris H. Bangma BFMB. Validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in a Dutch Population. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(3):224–30.
dc.sourceCorcos J, Behlouli H, Beaulieu S. Identifying cut-off scores with neural networks for interpretation of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):198–203.
dc.sourceMs AG, Hartmann KE, Hellwege JN, Velez DR, Ms E, Ms TLE. Systematic Review Obesity and pelvic organ prolapse : a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.039
dc.sourceGoulart F, Dias F, Henrique P, Fernandes G, Prudente A, Riccetto C. New strategies to improve results of mesh surgeries for vaginal prolapses repair – an update _______________________________________________. 2015;41(4):623–34
dc.sourceBalci BK, Ugurlucan FG, Yasa C, Yalcin O. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 5-year experience in the diagnosis and treatment of occult urinary incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2017;210:265–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.007
dc.sourceAigmueller T, Dungl A, Hinterholzer S, Geiss I, Riss P. An estimation of the frequency of surgery for posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21(3):299–302
dc.sourceNüssler E, Kesmodel US chiøler, Löfgren M, Nüssler EK arl. Operation for primary cystocele with anterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(3):359–66.
dc.sourceTsai C, Hung M, Shen P, Chen G, Su T, Chou M. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Factors that affect early recurrence after prolapse repair by a nonanchored vaginal mesh procedure. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2014;53(3):337–42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2014.07.004
dc.sourceRichter LA, Sokol AI. Pelvic Organ Prolapse---Vaginal and Laparoscopic Mesh. The Evidence. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016;43(1):83–92.
dc.sourceEllington DR, Richter HE. Indications, contraindications, and complications of mesh in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;56(2):276–88.
dc.sourceSu TH, Lau HH, Huang WC, Hsieh CH, Chang RC, Su CH. Single-incision mesh repair versus traditional native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: Results of a cohort study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2014;25(7):901–8.
dc.sourceUnger CA, Matthew D. Vaginal Mesh in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery : Controversies , Current Use , and Complications. 2015;58(4):740–53.
dc.sourceTrial ARC. Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse. 2010;116(2):293–303.
dc.sourceGutman RE, Nosti PA, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Peterson JL, Wang H, et al. Three-year outcomes of vaginal mesh for prolapse a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(4):770–7.
dc.sourceSociety AT. American Thoracic Society SERIE DE INFORMACIÓN AL PACIENTE www.thoracic.org ¿Qué es la bronquitis crónica? VÍA AÉREA NORMAL VÍA AÉREA CON BRONQUITIS. 2013;171(September):3–4. Available from: http://www.thoracic.org/
dc.sourceW Kerner JB. Definition,Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. 2014;3:1–3.
dc.sourceMcCracken JL, Veeranki SP, Ameredes BT, Calhoun WJ. Diagnosis and management of asthma in adults a review. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2017;318(3):279–90.
dc.sourceOlin BR. Hypertension: The Silent Killer: Updated JNC8 Guideline Recommendations Associate Clinical Professor of Pharmacy Practice, Drug Information and Learning Resource Center. 2015;
dc.sourceLüscher TF. Cardiomyopathies: Definition, diagnosis, causes, and genetics. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(23):1779–82.
dc.sourceWHO FCTC. Compilation of terms and definitions. World Heal Organ. 2001;17:1–47.
dc.sourceTachibana C, White A, Johnson N. Unit 8: Cell Biology and Cancer. Rediscovering Biol Mol to Glob Perspect. 2001;1–17.
dc.sourceWeber MA, Limpens J, Roovers JPWR. Assessment of vaginal atrophy: a review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2014;26(1):15–28.
dc.sourceMarambio G. A, Sandoval S. C, Valdevenito S. R, Naser n. M, Manríquez G. V, Guzmán R. R, et al. Prolapso genital. Etiopatogenia, diagnóstico y tratamiento. Rev Hosp Clín Univ Chile [Internet]. 2011;22:211–20. Available from: https://www.redclinica.cl/Portals/0/Users/014/14/14/Publicaciones/Revista/prolapso_genital_1.pdf
dc.sourceCésar P, Palma R, Vale M, Monteiro DC, Ledesma MA, Altuna S, et al. Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Using Transvaginal Anterior Mesh With Apical Fixation : A Prospective Multicenter Study With up to 2 Years of Follow-up. 2018;22(3):177–84.
dc.sourceIglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Peterson JL, et al. Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2, Part 1):293–303.
dc.sourceHüsch T, Mager R, Ober E, Bentler R, Ulm K, Haferkamp A. Quality of life in women of non-reproductive age with transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse: A cohort study. Int J Surg. 2016;33:36–41.
dc.sourceKinjo M, Yoshimura Y, Kitagawa Y, Okegawa T, Nutahara K. Sexual activity and quality of life in Japanese pelvic organ prolapse patients after transvaginal mesh surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(7):1302–7.
dc.sourceTakazawa N, Fujisaki A, Yoshimura Y, Tsujimura A, Horie S. Short-term outcomes of the transvaginal minimal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse. Investig Clin Urol. 2018;59(2):133.
dc.sourceDonna Mazloomdoost, MD, Rachel N. Pauls, MD, Steven D. Kleeman, MD, and Catrina C. Crisp, MD Ms. Outcomes and Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Surgical Management for Mesh Related Complications. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;00(00):547–8.
dc.sourceWang CL, Long CY, Juan YS, Liu CM, Hsu CS. Impact of total vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse on female sexual function. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;115(2):167–70.
dc.sourceLong CY, Juan YS, Wu MP, Liu CM, Chiang PH, Tsai EM. Changes in Female Sexual Function following Anterior with and without Posterior Vaginal Mesh Surgery for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. J Sex Med. 2012;9(8):2167–74
dc.sourceLong CY, Hsu CS, Wu MP, Lo TS, Liu CM, Tsai EM. Comparison of the changes in sexual function of premenopausal and postmenopausal women following transvaginal mesh surgery. J Sex Med. 2011;8(7):2009–16.
dc.sourceHuang WC, Lin TY, Lau HH, Chen SS, Hsieh CH, Su TH. Outcome of transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery with Prolift after a median of 2 years’ follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):197–203.
dc.sourceProlapse O. Vaginal Placement of Synthetic Mesh for Pelvic. 2011;118(513):1459–64.
dc.sourceMph ML, Geoffrion R, Walter J. No . 351-Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada [Internet]. 2017;39(11):1085–97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.05.006
dc.sourceMateu Arrom L, Errando Smet C, Gutierrez Ruiz C, Araño P, Palou Redorta J. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair with Mesh: Mid-Term Efficacy and Complications. Urol Int. 2018;101(2):201–5.
dc.sourceGlazener CMA, Breeman S, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper KG, Freeman RM, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet [Internet]. 2017;389(10067):381–92. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673616315963
dc.sourceDelroy CA, De A. Castro R, Dias MM, Feldner PC, Bortolini MAT, Girão MJBC, et al. The use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: A randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1899–907
dc.sourceWu Y (Maria), Reid J, Chou Q, MacMillan B, Leong Y, Welk B. Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. 2018; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3792-2
dc.sourceAube M, Guerin M, Rheaume C, Tu LM. Efficacy and patient satisfaction of pelvic organ prolapse reduction using transvaginal mesh: A Canadian perspective. Can Urol Assoc J = J l’Association des Urol du Canada. 2018 Oct;12(10):E432–7.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectPiso pélvico
dc.subjectIncontinencia urinaria
dc.subjectTransvaginal
dc.titleCalidad de vida, resultados y complicaciones en pacientes intervenidas de colpopexia con malla. Hospital Universitario Mayor 2015– 2018
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución