dc.creatorYamamoto, Jorge Kazuo
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-20T04:37:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:45:30Z
dc.date.available2012-10-20T04:37:14Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:45:30Z
dc.date.created2012-10-20T04:37:14Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifierCOMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, v.12, n.4, p.573-591, 2008
dc.identifier1420-0597
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/30317
dc.identifier10.1007/s10596-008-9096-8
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10596-008-9096-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1626957
dc.description.abstractThe issue of smoothing in kriging has been addressed either by estimation or simulation. The solution via estimation calls for postprocessing kriging estimates in order to correct the smoothing effect. Stochastic simulation provides equiprobable images presenting no smoothing and reproducing the covariance model. Consequently, these images reproduce both the sample histogram and the sample semivariogram. However, there is still a problem, which is the lack of local accuracy of simulated images. In this paper, a postprocessing algorithm for correcting the smoothing effect of ordinary kriging estimates is compared with sequential Gaussian simulation realizations. Based on samples drawn from exhaustive data sets, the postprocessing algorithm is shown to be superior to any individual simulation realization yet, at the expense of providing one deterministic estimate of the random function.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.relationComputational Geosciences
dc.rightsCopyright SPRINGER
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectOrdinary kriging
dc.subjectSmoothing effect
dc.subjectStochastic simulation
dc.subjectSequential Gaussian simulation
dc.titleEstimation or simulation? That is the question
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución