Intervention Programs For Sports Education In The School Context, Petb And Peab: Preliminary Study

dc.creatorGonzalez Espinosa
dc.creatorSergio; Ibenez Godoy
dc.creatorSergio Jose; Feu Molina
dc.creatorSebastian; Rafaela Galatti
dc.creatorLarissa
dc.date2017
dc.date2017-11-13T13:23:06Z
dc.date2017-11-13T13:23:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T05:55:48Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T05:55:48Z
dc.identifierRetos-nuevas Tendencias En Educacion Fisica Deporte Y Recreacion. Federacion Espanola Asoc Docentes Educacion Fisica-feadef, p. 107 - 113, 2017.
dc.identifier1579-1726
dc.identifier1988-2041
dc.identifierWOS:000396753600020
dc.identifierhttps://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20173049026
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/328032
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1365057
dc.descriptionLearning in sports has been one of the most common research topics in recent years in the field of sports pedagogy, and one of the areas that generated the biggest controversy is the comparison of different types of learning methodologies. In the absence of validated intervention programs designed in the basis of traditional and alternative paradigms of education, it is needed to address the validation of an intervention program positioned in two different methodologies for teaching a sport like basketball. The design of this research is instrumental. The validation process was performed by expert judgment, wherein 17 expert judges should attend from four to six predetermined selection criteria. For content validity the coefficient V Aiken was used. The reliability of the instrument was calculated using the Cronbach a. The intervention program is equivalent to each methodology, as well as the number of tasks, contents and practical situations. After analyzing the data, 38 of the 40 tasks that make up the intervention program exceeded the values required for validity (V > 0.70). Two tasks were created within traditional methodology and those suggested by the experts qualitatively changed. The reliability of the instrument was excellent with a value of .96. The Traditional Teaching Program Basketball and Compressive Teaching Program Basketball instruments are valid and reliable, therefore it can be used to compare two models for teaching basketball in school.
dc.description31
dc.description107
dc.description113
dc.languageSpanish
dc.publisherFederacion Espanola Asoc Docentes Educacion Fisica-FEADEF
dc.publisherMurcia
dc.relationRetos-Nuevas Tendencias En Educacion Fisica Deporte Y Recreacion
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceWOS
dc.subjectValidation
dc.subjectTeaching Methods
dc.subjectIntervention Program
dc.subjectBasketball
dc.subjectV Aiken
dc.titleIntervention Programs For Sports Education In The School Context, Petb And Peab: Preliminary Study
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución