dc.creatorRomano, Fábio Lourenço
dc.creatorTavares, Stenyo Wanderley
dc.creatorNouer, Darcy Flávio
dc.creatorConsani, Simonides
dc.creatorBorges de Araújo Magnani, Maria Beatriz
dc.date2005-Sep
dc.date2015-11-27T13:02:34Z
dc.date2015-11-27T13:02:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:01:42Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:01:42Z
dc.identifierThe Angle Orthodontist. v. 75, n. 5, p. 849-53, 2005-Sep.
dc.identifier0003-3219
dc.identifier10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[849:SBSOMO]2.0.CO;2
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16285044
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/196487
dc.identifier16285044
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1296720
dc.descriptionThe aim of this study was to determine the shear bond strength of different composites and to determine the adhesive remnant index (ARI) of metallic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer (TPSEP). Forty human premolars were divided into four equal groups. In group 1 (control), the Transbond XT was conventionally used. In groups 2-4, the TPSEP was used before bonding with Transbond XT, Z-100, and Concise Orthodontic, respectively. After the bonding, the samples were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. The brackets were debonded using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/ min. The shear bond strength (MPa) for group 1 (control), group 2 (TPSEP + Transbond XT), group 3 (TPSEP + Z-100), and group 4 (TPSEP + Concise Orthodontic) were of 6.43, 4.61, 4.74, and 0.02, respectively. Group 1 was statistically superior to other groups (P < .05), but there was no statistically significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (P > .05), although both were statistically superior to group 4 (P < .05). According to the ARI evaluation, most of the failures involved the bracket/composite interface (groups 1 and 2) as well as the enamel/composite interface (groups 3 and 4). The Transbond XT conventionally bonded showed better adhesion results than Transbond XT, Z-100, and Concise Orthodontic after using Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer.
dc.description75
dc.description849-53
dc.languageeng
dc.relationThe Angle Orthodontist
dc.relationAngle Orthod
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rights
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental
dc.subjectBicuspid
dc.subjectBisphenol A-glycidyl Methacrylate
dc.subjectComposite Resins
dc.subjectDental Alloys
dc.subjectDental Bonding
dc.subjectDental Enamel
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectOrthodontic Brackets
dc.subjectResin Cements
dc.subjectShear Strength
dc.subjectSilicon Dioxide
dc.subjectZirconium
dc.titleShear Bond Strength Of Metallic Orthodontic Brackets Bonded To Enamel Prepared With Self-etching Primer.
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución