[distal Radius Fractures: Consistency Of The Classifications].

dc.creatorde Oliveira Filho, Osvaldo Mendes
dc.creatorBelangero, William Dias
dc.creatorTeles, João Batista Mendes
dc.date
dc.date2015-11-27T12:58:18Z
dc.date2015-11-27T12:58:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:59:18Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:59:18Z
dc.identifierRevista Da Associação Médica Brasileira (1992). v. 50, n. 1, p. 55-61
dc.identifier0104-4230
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15253028
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/195867
dc.identifier15253028
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1296100
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this study was to determine the intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility of Frykman, AO and Universal classifications for the fractures of the distal radius. In this study, 40 radiographs of fractures of the distal radius were selected and classifed by orthopedists of different centers and levels of experience, determining the intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility of the classifications using Kappa statistic method. The medium intra-observer concordance observed was moderate to Frykman and Universal classifications and light to the AO system. The medium interobserver reproducibility was light in the two readings to Frykman and Universal classifications and despicable in the second reading of the AO classification. All the classifications used presented questionable interobserver reproducibility compromising the use of the three evaluated systems.
dc.description50
dc.description55-61
dc.languagepor
dc.relationRevista Da Associação Médica Brasileira (1992)
dc.relationRev Assoc Med Bras
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rights
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectObserver Variation
dc.subjectRadius Fractures
dc.subjectReproducibility Of Results
dc.title[distal Radius Fractures: Consistency Of The Classifications].
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución