The concept of Transcendental Object in A-Deduction: revolution or pre-critical fall?

dc.creatorFaggion, A
dc.date2008
dc.date2014-11-13T12:46:41Z
dc.date2015-11-26T18:07:27Z
dc.date2014-11-13T12:46:41Z
dc.date2015-11-26T18:07:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:49:35Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:49:35Z
dc.identifierTrans-form-acao. Unesp-marilia, v. 31, n. 1, n. 143, n. 152, 2008.
dc.identifier0101-3173
dc.identifierWOS:000261492900008
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/74985
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/74985
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/74985
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1293593
dc.descriptionThe present paper intends to advocate for the compatibility between the object's conception developed in Transcendental Deduction of the categories on the Critique of Pure Reason's first edition and critical philosophy's demands, even though Kant uses the expression "transcendental object" in that context. I would like to point out that the use of such expression by Kant shows a transition of object's concept from a traditional sense to a critical one in which "transcendental object" is not the thing in itself anymore.
dc.description31
dc.description1
dc.description143
dc.description152
dc.languagept
dc.publisherUnesp-marilia
dc.publisherMarilia Sp
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.relationTrans-form-acao
dc.relationTrans-Form-Acao
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjecttranscendental object
dc.subjectcritical philosophy
dc.subjectrule
dc.subjectunit
dc.subjectcategory
dc.subjectsensitive data
dc.titleThe concept of Transcendental Object in A-Deduction: revolution or pre-critical fall?
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución