dc.creatorMORAIS, PB
dc.creatorMARTINS, MB
dc.creatorKLACZKO, LB
dc.creatorMENDONCAHAGLER, LC
dc.creatorHAGLER, AN
dc.date1995
dc.dateDEC
dc.date2014-12-16T11:36:13Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:23:52Z
dc.date2014-12-16T11:36:13Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:23:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:11:10Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:11:10Z
dc.identifierApplied And Environmental Microbiology. Amer Soc Microbiology, v. 61, n. 12, n. 4251, n. 4257, 1995.
dc.identifier0099-2240
dc.identifierWOS:A1995TG91500018
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/55677
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/55677
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/55677
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1283934
dc.descriptionThe succession of yeasts colonizing the fallen ripe amapa fruit, from Parahancornia. amapa, aas examined. The occupation of the substrate depended on both the competitive interactions of yeast species, such as the production of killer toxins, and the selective dispersion by the drosophilid guild of the amapa fruit. The yeast community associated with this Amazon fruit differed from those isolated from other fruits in the same forest. The physiological profile of these yeasts was mostly restricted to the assimilation of a few simple carbon sources, mainly L-sorbose, D-glycerol, DL-lactate, cellobiose, and salicin. Common fruit-associated yeasts of the genera Kloeckera and Hanseniaspora, Candida guilliermondii, and Candida krusei colonized fruits during the first three days after the fruit fell. These yeasts were dispersed and served as food for the invader Drosophila malerkotliana. The resident flies of the Drosophila willistoni group fed selectively on patches of yeasts colonizing fruits 3 to 10 days after the fruit fell. The killer toxin-producing yeasts Pichia kluyveri var. kluyveri and Candida fructus were probably involved in the exclusion of some species during the intermediate stages of fruit deterioration. An increase in pH, inhibiting toxin activity and the depletion of simple sugars, may have promoted an increase in yeast diversity in the later stages of decomposition. The yeast succession provided a patchy environment for the drosophilids sharing this ephemeral substrate.
dc.description61
dc.description12
dc.description4251
dc.description4257
dc.languageen
dc.publisherAmer Soc Microbiology
dc.publisherWashington
dc.relationApplied And Environmental Microbiology
dc.relationAppl. Environ. Microbiol.
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectEphemeral Resource
dc.subjectCompetition
dc.subjectCommunities
dc.subjectHabitat
dc.subjectEcology
dc.titleYEAST SUCCESSION IN THE AMAZON FRUIT PARAHANCORNIA-AMAPA AS RESOURCE PARTITIONING AMONG DROSOPHILA SPP
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución