In vitro evaluation of the cleansing working time and analysis of the amount of gutta-percha or resilon remnants in the root canal walls after instrumentation for endodontic retreatment

dc.creatorCunha, RS
dc.creatorDe Martin, AS
dc.creatorBarros, PP
dc.creatorda Silva, FM
dc.creatorJacinto, RD
dc.creatorBueno, CED
dc.date2007
dc.dateDEC
dc.date2014-11-17T21:38:37Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:46:48Z
dc.date2014-11-17T21:38:37Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:46:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:32:44Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:32:44Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Endodontics. Elsevier Science Inc, v. 33, n. 12, n. 1426, n. 1428, 2007.
dc.identifier0099-2399
dc.identifierWOS:000251589700008
dc.identifier10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.004
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/69382
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/69382
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/69382
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1274643
dc.descriptionThe present study assessed the obturation removal and reinstrumentation working time of canals filled with Resilon/Real Seal in comparison with canals filled with gutta-percha/AH Plus. Thirty human extracted canines were instrumented. In group 1 (n = 15) root canals were filled with Resilon/Real Seal and in group 2 (n = 15) with gutta-percha/AH Plus sealer. The obturations were removed from both by using chloroform and irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl, and the canals were manually reinstrumented. The teeth were radiographically analyzed. Specimens without obturation material remnants visible in the radiographic examination were selected for analysis under scanning electron microscopy. The Resilon/Real Seal system was removed in greater quantities from the canal walls compared with the gutta-percha cones and the AH Plus cement. Time was not a significant factor. Under scanning electron microscopy analysis, the teeth presented material remnants in the 3 analyzed thirds. Resilon was better removed from the canal than the gutta-percha cones and the AH Plus.
dc.description33
dc.description12
dc.description1426
dc.description1428
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.publisherNew York
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationJournal Of Endodontics
dc.relationJ. Endod.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectendodontic retreatment
dc.subjectendodontics
dc.subjectresilon
dc.subjectDentin Bonding Agent
dc.subjectEpiphany
dc.subjectLeakage
dc.subjectCement
dc.subjectHand
dc.subjectSeal
dc.titleIn vitro evaluation of the cleansing working time and analysis of the amount of gutta-percha or resilon remnants in the root canal walls after instrumentation for endodontic retreatment
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución