Actas de congresos
Deterministic Versus Stochastic Dynamic Programming For Long Term Hydropower Scheduling
Registro en:
9781424484195
2011 Ieee Pes Trondheim Powertech: The Power Of Technology For A Sustainable Society, Powertech 2011. , v. , n. , p. - , 2011.
10.1109/PTC.2011.6019379
2-s2.0-80053346985
Autor
Zambelli M.S.
Soares S.
Da Silva D.
Institución
Resumen
This paper is concerned with the performance assessment of deterministic and stochastic dynamic programming approaches in long term hydropower scheduling. In order to focus the analysis on the stochastic nature of inflows, only single reservoir systems are considered, where the so-called "curse of dimensionality" is not a concern. The paper reviews the framework of dynamic programming for hydropower scheduling, highlighting the differences between deterministic and stochastic approaches. The performances of both methods are evaluated through simulation with the historical inflow records considering hydro plants from different river basins in Brazil. The conclusions indicate that the deterministic approach leads to operation rules which maintain the reservoirs fuller than does the stochastic one, providing greater hydropower efficiency but also greater water spillage. Despite these differences, both approaches yield a similar performance, which suggests that no significant benefit is obtained from considering stochastic inflows in long term hydropower scheduling. Furthermore, in critical hydrologic periods where no spillage occurs, the deterministic approach leads to a better performance than does the stochastic one. © 2011 IEEE.
IEEE,IEEE Power and Energy Society (PES) Stedinger, J.R., Sule, B.F., Loucks, D.P., Stochastic Dynamic Programming Models for Reservoir Operation Optimization (1984) Water Resources Research, 20 (11), pp. 1499-1505 Bellman, R.E., (1957) Dynamic Programming, , Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Arvanitidis, N.V., Rosing, J., Composite representation of a multireservoir hydroelectric power system (1970) IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-89, pp. 319-326 Cruz Jr., G., Soares, S., Non-Uniforme Composite Representation of Hydroelectric Systems for Long-Term Hydrothermal Scheduling (1996) IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11 (2), pp. 701-707 Pereira, M.V.F., Pinto, L.M.V.G., Multi-stage stochastic optimization applied to energy planning (1991) Mathematical Programming, Series B, 52 (2), pp. 359-375 Valdes, J.B., Filippo, J.M.D., Strzepek, K.M., Restrepo, P.J., Aggregation-disaggregation approach to multireservoir operation (1995) ASCE Journal of Water Resource Planning Management, 121 (5), pp. 345-351 Turgeon, A., OPTIMAL OPERATION OF MULTIRESERVOIR POWER SYSTEMS WITH STOCHASTIC INFLOWS. (1980) Water Resources Research, 16 (2), pp. 275-283 Labadie, J.W., Optimal Operation of Multireservoir Systems: State-of-the-art Review (2004) Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130 (2), pp. 93-111 Zambelli, M.S., Siqueira, T.G., Cicogna, M.A., Soares, S., Deterministic Versus Stochastic Models for Long-term Hydro-thermal Scheduling 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Montreal, Canada, June, 2006 Maceira, M.E.P., Terry, L.A., Costa, F.S., Damázio, J.M., Melo, A.C.G., Chain of optimization models for setting the energy dispatch and spot price in the Brazilian system Proceedings of the Power System Computation Conference - PSCC'02, Sevilla, Spain, June 24-28, 2002 Tse, E., Bar Shalom, Y., Generalized certainty equivalence and dual effect in stochastic control (1975) IEEE Transactions on Optimal Control, 6 AC-20, pp. 817-819 Philbrick, C.R., Kitanidis, P.K., Limitations of Deterministic Optimization Applied to Reservoir Operations (1999) Jour. of Water Res. Planning Management, 125 (3), pp. 135-142