Artículos de revistas
Factors Associated With Mode Of Delivery Among Primipara Women With One Previous Cesarean Section And Undergoing A Trial Of Labor  [a Prova De Trabalho E A Via De Parto Em Primíparas Com Uma Cesárea Anterior]
Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira. , v. 53, n. 2, p. 109 - 115, 2007.
OBJECTIVE. To identify factors associated with cesarean section in women with only one previous delivery by cesarean section and undergoing a trial of labor. METHODS. A retrospective cross sectional study was performed from 1986 to 1998 including a total of 1746 women with one prior cesarean section and delivering after a trial of labor. Cases with a current twin pregnancy or with malformation incompatible with life were excluded. Women were divided in two groups according to the mode of the second delivery: Cesarean (n=731) or Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC, n=1015). To identify factors associated to the mode of delivery, the prevalence ratios (PR) and the 95%CI for each isolated factor, adjusted according to age, were assessed. In each analysis, cases with missing information were excluded. RESULTS. The total rate of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean was 58.1%. The factors significantly associated with cesarean section were: higher maternal age, greater fundal height (PR 1.5; 95%CI 1.19-1.88), premature rupture of membranes (1.3; 1.08-1.54), amniotic fluid with an altered aspect (1.22; 1.04-1.43) or volume (1.32; 1.01-1.73), altered fetal heart rate (1.96; 1.68-2.28), non cephalic presentation (2.03; 1.54-2.66), induction of labor (1.74; 1.42-2.11) and no labor analgesia (2.57; 2.11-3.11). CONCLUSION. The factors associated with cesarean section were older age, non-cephalic presentation, premature rupture of membranes, signs of large fetus, the need of induction of labor and signs of compromised fetal wellbeing.532109115Villar, J., Valladares, E., Wojdyla, D., Zavaleta, N., Carroli, G., Velazco, A., Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: The 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin América (2006) Lancet, 367 (9525), pp. 1819-1829O'Driscoll, K., Foley, M., Correlation of decrease in perinatal mortality and increase in cesarean section rates (1983) Obstet Gynecol, 61, pp. 1-5Belizan, J.M., Althabe, F., Barros, F.C., Alexander, S., Rates and implications of cesarean sections in Latin America: Ecological study (1999) BMJ, 319, pp. 1397-1400Murray, S.F., Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: Qualitative and quantitative study (2000) BMJ, 321, pp. 1501-1505Kim, C., Ko, S.K., Kim, K.Y., Are league tables controlling epidemic of caesarean sections in South Korea? (2005) Br J Obstet Gynecol, 112, pp. 607-611Grobman, W.A., Peaceman, A.M., Socol, M.L., Cost-effectiveness of elective cesarean delivery after one prior low transverse cesarean (2000) Obstet Gynecol, 95, pp. 745-751Flamm, B.L., Once a cesarean, always a controversy (1997) Obstet Gynecol, 90, pp. 312-315Cragin, E., Conservatism in obstetrics (1916) N Y Med J, 104, pp. 1-3Dauphinee, J.V., Safety for the patient and the nurse (2004) J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 33, pp. 105-115Socol, M.L., (2003) VBAC: Is it worth the risk? Semin Perinatol, 27, pp. 105-111Brill, Y., Windrim, R., Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: Review of antenatal predictors of success (2003) J Obstet Gynecol Can, 25, pp. 275-286Committee opinion. Induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (2002) Obstet Gynecol, 99, pp. 679-680. , ACOG Committee on Obstetric PracticePotter, J.E., Berquó, E., Perpétuo, I.H.O., Leal, O.F., Hopkins, K., Souza, M.R., Unwanted cesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: Prospective study (2001) Br Med J, 323, pp. 1155-1158Cecatti JG, Andreucci CB, Cacheira PS, Besteti Pires HM, Pinto e Silva JLC, Aquino MMA. Fatores associados à realização de cesárea em primíparas com uma cesárea anterior. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2000;22:175-9Matias, J.P., Parpinelli, M.A., Cecatti, J.G., Passini Jr, R., A prova de trabalho de parto aumenta a morbidade materna e neonatal em primíparas com uma cesárea anterior? (2003) Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 25, pp. 255-260Brill, Y., Kingdom, J., Thomas, J., Fraser, W., Milne, J.K., Thomas, M., The management of VBAC at term: A survey of Canadian obstetricians (2003) J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 25, pp. 300-310Cecatti, J.G., Pires, H.M., Faundes, A., Duarte Osis, M.J., Factors associated with vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Brazilian women (2005) Rev Panam Salud Publica, 18, pp. 107-113Dodd, J.M., Crowther, C.A., Huertas, E., Guise, J.M., Horey, D., Planned elective repeat Caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous Caesarean birth (2006) Cochrane Review, (1). , The Cochrane Library, Oxford: Update SoftwareSantos, L.C., Amorim, M.M.R., Porto, A.M.F., Azevedo, E.B., Mesquita, C.C., Fatores prognósticos para o parto transvaginal em pacientes com cesárea anterior (1998) Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 20, pp. 342-349Reddy, U.M., DiVito, M.M., Armstrong, J.C., Hyslop, T., Wapner, R.J., Population adjustment of the definition of the vaginal birth after cesarean rate (2000) Am J Obstet Gynecol, 183, pp. 1166-1169Pires, H.M., Cecatti, J.G., Faundes, A., Factors associated with the trial of labor in primíparas women with one previous cesarean section (1999) Rev Saúde Pública, 33, pp. 342-348Socol, M.L., Peaceman, A.M., Vaginal birth after cesarean: An appraisal of fetal risk (1999) Obstet Gynecol, 93, pp. 674-679O'Brien-Abel, N., Uterine rupture during VBAC trial of labor: Risk factors and fetal response (2003) J Midwifery Womens Health, 48, pp. 249-257Shipp, T.D., Zelop, C.M., Repke, J.T., Cohen, A., Caughey, A.B., Lieberman, E., Labor after previous cesarean: Influence of prior indication and parity (2000) Obstet Gynecol, 95, pp. 913-916Linton, A., Peterson, M.R., Williams, T.V., Effects of maternal characteristics on cesarean delivery rates among US Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 1996-2002 (2004) Birth, 31, pp. 3-11Lydon-Rochelle, M., Holt, V.L., Easterling, T.R., Martin, D., Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery (2001) N Engl J Med, 345, pp. 3-8Lieberman, E., Risk factors for uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean (2001) Clin Obstet Gynecol, 44, pp. 609-621Fisler, R.E., Cohen, A., Ringer, S.A., Lieberman, E., Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section (2003) Birth, 30, pp. 83-88Mozurkewich, E.L., Hutton, E.K., Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999 (2000) Am J Obstet Gynecol, 183, pp. 1187-1197