Buscar
Mostrando ítems 11-20 de 2310
Modeling time and valuation in structured argumentation frameworks
(Elsevier, 2015-01)
Temporal Argumentation Frameworks (TAF) represent a recent extension of Dung's abstract argumentation frameworks that consider the temporal availability of arguments. In a TAF, arguments are valid during specific time ...
An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
(Elsevier Science, 2017-01)
In this paper we introduce a formalism for single-agent decision making that is based on Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks. The formalism can be used to justify a choice, which is based on the current situation the agent ...
An Approach to Argumentation Schemes that Appeal to Expert Opinion
(Asociación Española para la Inteligencia Artificial, 2013-12)
Argumentation is a form of reasoning that deeply resembles the human mechanism for commonsense reasoning. An argumentation scheme is a representational tool for modeling common patterns of reasoning; in particular, it ...
Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks
(Elsevier Science Inc, 2017-02)
A Timed Argumentation Framework (TAF) is a formalism where arguments are only valid for consideration during specific intervals of time, called availability intervals, which are defined for every individual argument. The ...
Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
(Elsevier Science, 2009-12)
The problems that arise from the presence of self-attacking arguments and odd-length cycles of attack within argumentation frameworks are widely recognized in the literature on defeasible argumentation. This paper introduces ...
Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
(College Publications, 2021-07)
While modelling arguments, it is often useful to represent joint attacks, i.e., cases where multiple arguments jointly attack another (note that this is different from the case where multiple arguments attack another in ...
Generalized abstract argumentation: Handling arguments in FOL fragments
(Springer, 2009-06)
Generalized argumentation frameworks relate formulae in classical logic to arguments based on the Dung's classic framework. The main purpose of the generalization is to provide a theory capable of reasoning (following ...
Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence
(IOS Press, 2020)
We consider a generalisation of abstract argumentation frameworks where arguments need to be backed by pieces of evidence in order to be actually present in the argumentation framework. These pieces of evidence come with ...
Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
(Elsevier Science, 2018-09)
Over the last decade, several extensions of Dung's Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs) have been introduced in the literature. Some of these extensions concern the nature of the attack relation, such as the consideration ...
Beyond admissibility: Accepting cycles in argumentation with game protocols for cogency criteria
(Oxford University Press, 2016-08)
In this article, we extend Dung's formal approach from admissibility to less demanding extension semantics allowing arguments in cycles of attacks. We present an acceptance criterion leading to the characterization of three ...