Buscar
Mostrando ítems 31-40 de 23260
Generalized abstract argumentation: Handling arguments in FOL fragments
(Springer, 2009-06)
Generalized argumentation frameworks relate formulae in classical logic to arguments based on the Dung's classic framework. The main purpose of the generalization is to provide a theory capable of reasoning (following ...
Pyrrhonian Argumentation: Therapy, Dialectic, and Inquiry
(De Gruyter, 2020-04)
The Pyrrhonist's argumentative practice is characterized by at least four features. First, he makes a therapeutic use of arguments: He employs arguments that differ in their persuasiveness in order to cure his dogmatic ...
Inconsistent-tolerant base revision through Argument Theory Change
(OXFORD UNIV PRESSOXFORD, 2012)
Reasoning and change over inconsistent knowledge bases (KBs) is of utmost relevance in areas like medicine and law. Argumentation may bring the possibility to cope with both problems. Firstly, by constructing an argumentation ...
Rhetoric construction of legal argument.La construcción retórica de la argumentación jurídica.
(Universidad Católica del Uruguay, 2016)
A structured argumentation system with backing and undercutting
(Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, 2016-03)
This work introduces Extended Defeasible Logic Programming (E-DeLP), a structured argumentation system enabling the expression of reasons for and against using defeasible rules. E-DeLP extends the formalism of Defeasible ...
An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
(Elsevier Science, 2017-01)
In this paper we introduce a formalism for single-agent decision making that is based on Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks. The formalism can be used to justify a choice, which is based on the current situation the agent ...
Judgement aggregation in multi-agent argumentation
(Oxford University Press, 2017-02)
Given a set of conflicting arguments, there can exist multiple plausible opinions about which arguments should be accepted, rejected or deemed undecided. We study the problem of how multiple such judgements can be aggregated. ...
Ontology Reasoning and Evolution with Inconsistency Tolerance: An Argumentative Approach to Revision of Description Logics
(IOS Press, 2016-03-02)
Reasoning and change over inconsistent ontologies (i-ont(s)) is of utmost relevance in sciences like medicine and law. Argumentation may be an appropriate formalism to cope with both problems: (reasoning) through an ...