Buscar
Mostrando ítems 1-10 de 2357
Deliberating over legislative ends An inventory of goal-(de)legitimizing argument schemes
(John Benjamins, 2020)
This paper outlines a non-exhaustive inventory of presumptive argument schemes that can be used by legislators to rationally argue for and against the legitimacy of legislative ends. The inventory has both a descriptive ...
An illustration of the argument principle
(Wolfram Demonstration Project, 2011)
An illustration of the argument principle
(Wolfram Demonstration Project, 2016)
Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation Foreword
This book clarifies the meaning of the most important and pervasive concepts and tools in bioethical argumentation (principles, values, dignity, rights, duties, deliberation, prudence) and assesses the methodological ...
Communicative process in a teacher training course: An analysis based on the argumentary principles of Perelman and Olbrechts-TytecaProcesso comunicativo em um curso de formação de professores: Uma análise baseada nos princípios argumentativos de Perelman e Olbrechts-Tyteca
(2020-01-01)
Although many studies are conducted on the argumentation in science education, there are still several aspects to explore. This research aims analyze, based on the argumentative principles of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca ...
A argumentação na infância: um estudo de caso a partir de uma perspectiva enunciativa
(Universidade Federal do Pampa, 2016)
Rethinking specificity in defeasible reasoning and its effect in argument reinstatement
(Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science, 2017-08)
The principle of reinstatement governing most argument systems states that an argument is reinstated when all its defeaters are in turn ultimately defeated. Nevertheless, some criticisms to this principle have been offered ...
Plato's Argumentative Strategies in Theaetetus and Sophist
(De Gruyter, 2016)
In Theaetetus and Sophist, Plato accomplishes a construction operation of his adversaries which leads him to associate doctrines regularly attributed to Heracliteans or Eleatic thinkers with different sophistical positions. ...