dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:38Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:38Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:24:38Z
dc.date.issued2010-02-01
dc.identifierOrthodontics and Craniofacial Research, v. 13, n. 1, p. 48-55, 2010.
dc.identifier1601-6335
dc.identifier1601-6343
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71573
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01474.x
dc.identifierWOS:000273461100007
dc.identifier2-s2.0-74049121957
dc.identifier8547747556446020
dc.identifier8223795731605246
dc.description.abstractAuthors - Magno AFF, Martins RP, Vaz LG, Martins LP Objectives - Evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) of indirect bonded lingual brackets using xenon plasma arc light, light-emitting diode (LED) and conventional quartz-tungsten-halogen light. Material and Methods - Lingual brackets were bonded indirectly to 60 premolars divided to three groups according to the curing light used: Group 1, plasma arc for 6 s; Group 2, LED for 10 s; and Group 3, halogen light for 40 s. After bonding, the specimens were subjected to a shear force until debonding. The debonding pattern was assessed and classified according to the ARI scores. The mean shear bond strengths were accessed by anova followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons. ARI scores were assessed using the chi-square test. Results - The three groups showed significant differences (p < 0.001), with the averages of group 1 < group 2 < group 3. Groups showed no differences regarding ARI scores. Conclusion - Bonding lingual brackets indirectly with plasma arc, during 60% of the time used for the LED, produced lower SBS than obtained with the latter. Using LED during 25% of the time of the halogen light produced lower SBS than obtained with the latter. These differences did not influence the debonding pattern and are clinically acceptable according to the literature. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationOrthodontics and Craniofacial Research
dc.relation2.077
dc.relation1,318
dc.relation1,318
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDental bonding
dc.subjectLight-cured
dc.subjectOrthodontic brackets
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectShear bond strength
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectdental bonding
dc.subjectdental care
dc.subjectdental equipment
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectorthodontic device
dc.subjectshear strength
dc.subjectCuring Lights, Dental
dc.subjectDental Bonding, Light-Cured
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectOrthodontic Brackets
dc.subjectShear Strength
dc.titleIn vitro lingual bracket evaluation of indirect bonding with plasma arc, LED and halogen light
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución