dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-27T11:24:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-27T11:24:38Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014-05-27T11:24:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-02-01 | |
dc.identifier | Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, v. 13, n. 1, p. 48-55, 2010. | |
dc.identifier | 1601-6335 | |
dc.identifier | 1601-6343 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71573 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01474.x | |
dc.identifier | WOS:000273461100007 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-74049121957 | |
dc.identifier | 8547747556446020 | |
dc.identifier | 8223795731605246 | |
dc.description.abstract | Authors - Magno AFF, Martins RP, Vaz LG, Martins LP Objectives - Evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) of indirect bonded lingual brackets using xenon plasma arc light, light-emitting diode (LED) and conventional quartz-tungsten-halogen light. Material and Methods - Lingual brackets were bonded indirectly to 60 premolars divided to three groups according to the curing light used: Group 1, plasma arc for 6 s; Group 2, LED for 10 s; and Group 3, halogen light for 40 s. After bonding, the specimens were subjected to a shear force until debonding. The debonding pattern was assessed and classified according to the ARI scores. The mean shear bond strengths were accessed by anova followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons. ARI scores were assessed using the chi-square test. Results - The three groups showed significant differences (p < 0.001), with the averages of group 1 < group 2 < group 3. Groups showed no differences regarding ARI scores. Conclusion - Bonding lingual brackets indirectly with plasma arc, during 60% of the time used for the LED, produced lower SBS than obtained with the latter. Using LED during 25% of the time of the halogen light produced lower SBS than obtained with the latter. These differences did not influence the debonding pattern and are clinically acceptable according to the literature. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research | |
dc.relation | 2.077 | |
dc.relation | 1,318 | |
dc.relation | 1,318 | |
dc.rights | Acesso restrito | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Dental bonding | |
dc.subject | Light-cured | |
dc.subject | Orthodontic brackets | |
dc.subject | Orthodontics | |
dc.subject | Shear bond strength | |
dc.subject | comparative study | |
dc.subject | dental bonding | |
dc.subject | dental care | |
dc.subject | dental equipment | |
dc.subject | evaluation | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | orthodontic device | |
dc.subject | shear strength | |
dc.subject | Curing Lights, Dental | |
dc.subject | Dental Bonding, Light-Cured | |
dc.subject | Dental Stress Analysis | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Orthodontic Brackets | |
dc.subject | Shear Strength | |
dc.title | In vitro lingual bracket evaluation of indirect bonding with plasma arc, LED and halogen light | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |